Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 16 June 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 621 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

The policy memorandum sets out that the overarching policy intention in taking the delegated power in part 2 is

“to ensure that the legislation remains fit for purpose and could be adapted, if required, to allow effective action in response to the twin climate and biodiversity crises.”

Do you agree that the proposed power is needed to ensure that EIA legislation and habitats regulations remain fit for purpose?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Okay.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

My substantive question is about statutory impact assessments. Do any of you have concerns about how such assessments might, or might not, apply to aquaculture developments beyond the 3-nautical-mile limit?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

To slightly turn the issue on its head, what is so wrong with the national parks aims, as they stand, that they need to be amended by the bill? What is being prevented? I remember that the aims were hard fought for at the time, and the right balance seemed to have been created. If it ain’t broke, why fix it?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

It seems to me that it is not altogether clear what regulation with regard to impact assessments would be required. The information that we have is that strategic environmental assessments will not be required, but wider environmental impacts could be considered. It is just not very clear that, given the 3-nautical-mile limit, the legislation that applies further inshore does not apply that far out.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

What processes take place to consult the fishing industry about all the developments, not just those in aquaculture? I ask that because it feels as though you will be squeezed and squeezed, especially in the case of some of the bigger offshore energy projects. I do not know whether you can work in between those, but I would not have thought so. Are you consulted? Are changes made to accommodate your needs?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 14 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

We have heard some concerns that assessments would apply beyond the 3-nautical-mile limit, while other feedback has suggested that they would not. There seems to be a bit of dubiety in that respect.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

I will turn the question on its head slightly. Might you have to do other things—for instance, in relation to another species—that might not necessarily protect the species around which the designation sits? I am trying to remember the case that we were given. Would you have to stop implementing those other policies because they might not sit comfortably in relation to the species that was designated?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

We were told in evidence that designations under the habitats regulations, in particular, often homed in on one species rather than the area as a whole and that that could have unintended consequences for other species and different things living in that area. It was felt that it should be a wider process. If a species is under threat, it should be protected, but the impact should be measured of those management techniques on other species in the area and on wider environmental and biodiversity issues.

You have a puzzled look, which suggests that you do not quite understand me.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Natural Environment (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 7 May 2025

Rhoda Grant

Would that be the case even if one species was not protected and one was?