The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 621 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
The policy memorandum sets out that the overarching policy intention in taking the delegated power in part 2 is
“to ensure that the legislation remains fit for purpose and could be adapted, if required, to allow effective action in response to the twin climate and biodiversity crises.”
Do you agree that the proposed power is needed to ensure that EIA legislation and habitats regulations remain fit for purpose?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
My substantive question is about statutory impact assessments. Do any of you have concerns about how such assessments might, or might not, apply to aquaculture developments beyond the 3-nautical-mile limit?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
To slightly turn the issue on its head, what is so wrong with the national parks aims, as they stand, that they need to be amended by the bill? What is being prevented? I remember that the aims were hard fought for at the time, and the right balance seemed to have been created. If it ain’t broke, why fix it?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
It seems to me that it is not altogether clear what regulation with regard to impact assessments would be required. The information that we have is that strategic environmental assessments will not be required, but wider environmental impacts could be considered. It is just not very clear that, given the 3-nautical-mile limit, the legislation that applies further inshore does not apply that far out.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
What processes take place to consult the fishing industry about all the developments, not just those in aquaculture? I ask that because it feels as though you will be squeezed and squeezed, especially in the case of some of the bigger offshore energy projects. I do not know whether you can work in between those, but I would not have thought so. Are you consulted? Are changes made to accommodate your needs?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 14 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
We have heard some concerns that assessments would apply beyond the 3-nautical-mile limit, while other feedback has suggested that they would not. There seems to be a bit of dubiety in that respect.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
I will turn the question on its head slightly. Might you have to do other things—for instance, in relation to another species—that might not necessarily protect the species around which the designation sits? I am trying to remember the case that we were given. Would you have to stop implementing those other policies because they might not sit comfortably in relation to the species that was designated?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
We were told in evidence that designations under the habitats regulations, in particular, often homed in on one species rather than the area as a whole and that that could have unintended consequences for other species and different things living in that area. It was felt that it should be a wider process. If a species is under threat, it should be protected, but the impact should be measured of those management techniques on other species in the area and on wider environmental and biodiversity issues.
You have a puzzled look, which suggests that you do not quite understand me.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
Would that be the case even if one species was not protected and one was?