The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 706 contributions
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
Thank you. Sorry, I was not trying to shut out the rest of the panel, but I thought it was important to get to that. Has anyone got anything to add, or is everyone happy with that?
Rachel, I am sorry—we did not see your hand or your R in the chat.
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
I almost wish I had never asked. [Laughter.]
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
How would you characterise RO, then?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
Those other decisions would normally be taken in conjunction with their parents. Parents come to parents’ night and are with their children while they choose their subjects. When giving the right to the child to opt out, how do you involve parents?
Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
The objective of part 1 of the bill is to comply with the UNCRC, as well as to provide coherence and clarity on the process of withdrawal from RME. It is clear that folk believe that the bill does not really comply with the UNCRC, so I will not ask you whether it does. I suppose that my question is about how we make it comply. How do we make the bill achieve the objectives that the Government has set out?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
That was my thinking.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
There are new safeguards in the bill, such as the 10-year restriction on assignation if the commission lets a croft, as well as the powers to address boundary inaccuracies. How significant are the issues that those measures in the bill are trying to address? Are they causing huge problems? Will the new powers be workable in practice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
What about the case of somebody who wanted to assign their croft to a family member because of their ill health, so huge amounts of money would not be changing hands and people would not be speculating? Would the 10-year burden then fall on the person to whom the croft was assigned?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 September 2025
Rhoda Grant
A lot of the practical changes in the bill seem like common sense—I am thinking of measures such as moving notices on to digital platforms and the three-year cycle for the census. Are there some risks involved in that? For example, with regard to the census, information might become out of date much more quickly. In addition, when it comes to the use of digital platforms, given that crofters tend to be an ageing community, will they have the same level of access? How will you ensure that people have the information that they need when they need it?