The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 609 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
Would the standards highlighted in section 3(a) be enough to curtail the power and ensure that it was used for the right reasons?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
I asked whether the proposed changes could create a hierarchy of aims for a national park. The legislation as it stands says that all aims are equal unless there is a conflict between them. I guess the concern is that, if you upset that balance, you might end up with a hierarchy of aims, and that could impact on people’s views of a national park.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
When the bill was initially proposed, there were concerns about local economies, local cultures and the like being secondary to a national park’s main aim, which is to preserve the nature and biodiversity of the park. I see more reluctance or pushback against new national parks than there was when the first legislation went through, when people were keen to have national parks in their area. The issue seems to have become a lot more controversial. Have the aims changed slightly, and has that led to a lack of confidence among those living and working in national parks?
12:00Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
That approach seems easier for Orkney and Shetland, as their sea spaces are unique to them, whereas I think that conflicts will arise in, say, the Minch, where there are several local authorities involved. How will they work together? Do they have the resources to be able to plan?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
Are there other instances where such a power would be required? Given that enforcement is an issue for you, could the bill be amended in such a way as to enable the 2017 regulations to be changed while narrowing the scope of the regulatory power that is being implemented through the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
The evidence that we had prior to this is that there is flexibility within the regulations as they stand.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
So, would you prefer an affirmative order plus a non-regression clause plus a referral back to section 3(a)?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
I have a quick supplementary, to give an example of the breadth of what is allowed. Under section 3, regulations can be made
“to ensure consistency or compatibility with other legal regimes (either domestic or international)”.
That is vast. Section 3(a) has some of the standards that should be followed, such as
“restoring, enhancing or managing the natural environment ... preserving, protecting or restoring biodiversity”
and
“environmental assessments”.
Is it possible to amend the bill to say that the powers in it can be used only in pursuit of section 3(a)? That would mean that they could not be as wide as to take in anything—they would have to be within the spirit of the bill and what we are trying to achieve here.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 May 2025
Rhoda Grant
What are your views on the changes to the statutory purposes for national parks? What will be the practical impact of those changes? What is wrong with the powers as they stand? Is there any likelihood that the changes could lead to a hierarchy of powers and aims?