The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 706 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
How will that impact the other tiers, if the system cannot deliver?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
What impact has that had on the design of the other tiers that the system cannot deal with at the moment? How restrictive is that when it comes to designing the tiers? That is what we are trying to get to.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
If there is no cost involved, surely you could give a guarantee that there will be support to allow people to do that. If we take into account demographics, access to equipment and so on, that support would not be a lot. There will be people who are perfectly capable of doing that themselves, but there will be others who are not.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
It feels like you are putting the cart before the horse. We had understood that the rural support plan was going to be the foundation of everything—that it was the strategy for how agriculture was going to be supported. It now feels like it will be a jigsaw puzzle of some things that are already in place and some things that are not. It does not feel very straightforward. Will the rural support plan be a meaningful document, or will it be a load of other pre-decided policies put together? Will there be a rural support plan in the way that we understood?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
I do not agree that that is the case—I feel that we do not have a handle on the Government’s vision and direction for agriculture. In a way, that is what the plan was supposed to set out. It just seems that we have a piecemeal approach, and I think the farming community, certainly, was really—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
My question is about the information technology system. The cabinet secretary said that it was not really designed for a four-tier support system. Can it now deliver a four-tier support system? Is that being worked on?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
It really does not feel that way, given that it follows on from the suckler cow premium. It feels as if there is no understanding of what crofters are about. We were told when the Agriculture and Rural Communities (Scotland) Bill passed that the measures would be proportionate, but we have a one-size-fits-all scheme that does not take account of the age demographic and, if the form is online, whether people have access to IT. That rules out many crofters from doing it themselves. All I am asking is that you put in place the support to ensure that it is affordable for them to apply and that the cost of doing so does not come out of the payments that they receive.
My real fear is that all these things will put people out of business and make them give up. That will impact not only on them but on the environment, because a lot of that land management practice is good for the environment and nature. You need to protect that, because, frankly, if you do not, you will be throwing out the baby with the bath water.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
Beatrice Wishart has been flagging that point since last year. The answers are there; you have said that on the record. All those things have been discussed, agreed and put to bed, so, if there is no issue, why was that information not communicated before this point?
On the calving intervals SSI, the trust issue is that you gave guarantees that you would take into account the issues that island and crofting communities face, but, to date, you have not put on the record what the derogations and supports will be. You can understand why there is a lack of support when you say to people, “Yes, of course we are taking cognisance of this,” but you do not give the information. I feel as though we have dragged information out of you today about the fact that this can be delivered with no cost and will not be detrimental to people. Had that been made clear, I do not think that we would have had this communication. We are all trying to get to the same place, so why is there reluctance to give the guarantees that people need?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 18 February 2025
Rhoda Grant
So private buyers are held to a different code, if you like, from community buyers.