The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 706 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
I am afraid to say that I remember the process of the original legislation, and I guess that the four aims were hard fought for in trying to get the balance right. There is an additional focus on different areas through the priorities that are set out in paragraphs (a) to (f) of the proposed new section 1(2) of the National Parks (Scotland) Act 2000, but paragraph (f) is the only one that really looks at people’s wellbeing. All the others look at the area, tourism or climate change—nothing really to do with the wellbeing of people. Could that skew the balance of those aims? Previously, we had four equally balanced aims in which, obviously, the natural environment was a priority. I am wondering whether the new sub-aims could skew the balance.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Given that both national parks raised the issue of housing, do you not think that we should be looking specifically at housing for the local community?
09:15Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
To slightly turn this on its head, what are you hoping to gain with the new sub-aims?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
I am simply reflecting what people have said to me, which is that the people who were looking to build a consensus on a national park were not necessarily people who had a community focus. There were groups that were keen on having a national park that had aims and objectives that the community was aware of but that the community felt did not reflect their views. I think that that did not help.
Will a look be taken at having a mechanism that allows communities to come together to discuss a national park proposal very openly without feeling that they are in a yes or no position, which immediately forces them to pick a side, depending on their level of trust or mistrust of the organisation that is promoting the proposal? It seemed to me that it was almost a no-go area for many people from the outset, because of the way in which the putting forward of proposals was being handled.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Do you think that our national parks have been delivering up till now?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
The drivers for reviewing national park legislation were the strategic framework for biodiversity and recognition of the role of national parks in tackling the twin crises. However, many stakeholders have described the changes that are proposed in the bill as “modest”. What impact will part 3 of the bill have on national parks’ ability to contribute to addressing those big societal challenges?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
Amendment 345 would expand the bodies that can report breaches to include community bodies, such as community controlled bodies as defined in the Community Empowerment (Scotland) Act 2015, and community councils. Amendment 346 includes the Crofting Commission and grazing committees as bodies that would be able to report breaches of land management obligations.
Amendment 347 pertains to breaches in land management plans. The bill allows for fines to be imposed for breaches of obligations. A large landowner could choose to pay the fines and continue to breach their obligations. The bill does not include further sanctions in that situation. Amendment 347 sets out the parameters for the process of compulsory purchase after five successive years of breaches.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
I was finished, but I will.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
I will also speak to Mercedes Villalba’s amendments. Do you want me to do that at the same time, or do you want me to leave it to the point at which she will have come in?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 10 June 2025
Rhoda Grant
What does the member think is required in the bill to make people take their responsibilities seriously? We all know of landowners whom people are unable to contact, who do not deal with the community and who are a dead hand. Small fines will not bring them to the table. The bill really needs to have teeth. If the member is not happy with the larger fines or compulsory purchase powers, what would he suggest would bring those landowners to the table?