Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 29 October 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 706 contributions

|

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Okay, but the bill’s provisions will fall outwith the UNCRC, because the bill is amending legislation from 1980.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Are there examples of the 1998 act exemption having been used?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Following on from that, I note that some witnesses have told us that part 1 of the bill is not compatible with the UNCRC, because it amends the 1980 act. Is the bill compatible?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Yes—of course it is about being compatible.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Given what you have said before, cabinet secretary, about the complexity of all this legislation, should you have been considering a consolidation bill to bring the legislation into the scope of the UNCRC, rather than an amending act?

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

But such an exemption has never been used.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Following on from the previous question and the cabinet secretary’s quite clear statement that she is not aware of any act of Parliament that would require action that was incompatible, I want to ask, given the concerns about part 2, whether it is necessary. After all, you do not believe that there is any legislation that would require the provisions in part 2, but it still seems to water down children’s rights.

Equalities, Human Rights and Civil Justice Committee [Draft]

Children (Withdrawal from Religious Education and Amendment of UNCRC Compatibility Duty) (Scotland) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 28 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

But you cannot give any examples of where it would come into play.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

Following on from what Brian Inkster said, I think that the commission is clear that it needs people to tell it about neglect in order for it to be able to investigate that. Asking the grazing committee to report on what is going on has not worked—it was clear that it would never work when that was legislated for. I am speaking not for the commission but from my understanding of what it was saying, which is that changing the process in order to allow others to report would take that reporting duty away from the grazing committee and would allow other people who saw neglect to report it.

It seems to me that neglect is one of the biggest issues that we hear about, and we hear about it all the time. Speak to anyone and they would say that. The cross-party group on crofting is always talking about neglect and about the fact that people are waiting to get crofts while others are holding crofts that they are doing nothing with. Therefore, I can understand why the commission has said, “Someone needs to tell us what’s going on. We can’t know everything unless we have people in every community telling us that.” However, that would be nigh on impossible. Might folk have a better idea about how such issues could be identified?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]

Crofting and Scottish Land Court Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 8 October 2025

Rhoda Grant

How would we do that in legislation, given that, as you said earlier, some people know that they have the share floating around and that something is going on in the common grazing that will bring them an income, whereas—