Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 10 March 2026
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1586 contributions

|

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Budget 2026-27 and Scottish Spending Review

Meeting date: 4 March 2026

Pauline McNeill

So, the £90.3 million does not include the £30.4 million?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Budget 2026-27 and Scottish Spending Review

Meeting date: 4 March 2026

Pauline McNeill

So, you will have fewer than 600 of those officers under the budget arrangement.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Budget 2026-27 and Scottish Spending Review

Meeting date: 4 March 2026

Pauline McNeill

I guess that communities want to have a connection with the local police officer. To what extent, in your model, do you think that there might be more connection with local communities, with a named police officer, for instance? One of my criticisms of the centralisation is that Police Scotland feels like such a big organisation. When someone calls the police to find out what has happened following a crime that has been committed, the officer concerned will often not be on duty for ages. There is a disconnect there: that is where people feel a lack of confidence. Will the model bring some connection or some identity back?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2026

Pauline McNeill

Good morning. I am clear about the reasons why you are taking this approach, so I will not go into that.

In response to Liam Kerr, you mentioned a reduction in the prison population due to the change to people having to serve only 40 per cent of their sentence. If you had the projected figure for what would happen if there were a further reduction to 30 per cent, that would be useful.

You said that there would be no supervision of people who were subject to early release. Could those prisoners be released even earlier on home detention curfew? Apologies if you have answered that before, but I just want to be clear. Will they still serve that 30 per cent of their sentence in prison, or are there any circumstances in which they could be in prison for even less time than that?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2026

Pauline McNeill

It would be, because, as I have said in the chamber before, the public will find the proposal very difficult to accept and understand. I am not starting a different conversation about alternatives to custody in the longer term, because I support that notion. What we are talking about is trying to get the public’s head around someone who has been given a four-year sentence serving only whatever 30 per cent of that would be—maybe you could do the maths for me on that; it would be easier if I had said three years.

We need to be clear about how much of their sentence people are going to spend in jail. However, I think that the answer to my question is that some people might not even serve 30 per cent of their sentence in jail, if they meet the criteria. Would you agree that that is the difficult bit for the public to accept? Under the proposals, we are just not clear how much time people will spend in jail in every case.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Budget 2026-27 and Scottish Spending Review

Meeting date: 4 March 2026

Pauline McNeill

That is a relief.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 4 March 2026

Pauline McNeill

There have been court cases because of probationers being summarily dismissed. My issue is not general vetting but the proposed power. I raised the matter during the passage of the 2025 act, because I was never comfortable with it. The Scottish Police Federation thinks that the power could enable vetting to be used as an excuse to get rid of police officers and that the process should be more transparent. That is my only issue, but we have to ensure that the right route is in place.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice System (Challenges for Session 7)

Meeting date: 4 March 2026

Pauline McNeill

Yes. Thank you.

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice System (Challenges for Session 7)

Meeting date: 4 March 2026

Pauline McNeill

There is a fine line to be drawn when it comes to the powers of police officers to use force in the course of law enforcement and an allegation of assault. Is that the sort of case that we are talking about or is it more varied?

Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]

Criminal Justice System (Challenges for Session 7)

Meeting date: 4 March 2026

Pauline McNeill

Do you think that the decision to change the corroboration rules should be reviewed because there is perhaps a much lower bar for an allegation of assault against a police officer that comes to the PIRC?