The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1227 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Pauline McNeill
I agree with that. On the new offence that will cover Scotland on encouraging or assisting serious self-harm, I do not know the background to that particular clause, but there was a very concerning case about self-harm on social media. Would that be an example of something that we would want to address?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Pauline McNeill
Oh, sorry—have I?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Pauline McNeill
Yes.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Pauline McNeill
I am confused, because I was expecting to see Maree Todd speak to the item. I am sorry.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Pauline McNeill
So, that concern is still there.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Pauline McNeill
Where is the bill coming from? That is the difficulty that I have in making an assessment on the matter. Did the Scottish Government fully review what changes had been made to the bill?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 21 June 2023
Pauline McNeill
I am just trying to get my head round the changes that have been made. How would you describe them? Would you say that they are fairly minor or superficial? Do you think that there have been any substantive changes since we last discussed the matter?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Pauline McNeill
Good morning, everyone. In our previous session, I was very interested—and I still am—in image-based abuse across the board. I have done a bit of work since that conversation, and I am now convinced that there is a gap in the law in relation to abusive sex-based images, and particularly in relation to consent. I am talking about the sharing of those images and the damage and harm that can be done to children and young people in particular. That is the context.
Alison Penman mentioned that issue specifically. I want to ask her about young people—or however we want to categorise older children.
I noted everything in your submissions about the importance of how you message young people. You would not do that in the same way that you would to adults. I am conscious that most of the work focuses on the risk that is presented by adults. However, we are talking about children. Do you think that there is a gap in the law in relation to the harm that can be done if images are shared? I know that Stuart Allardyce has mentioned that fake images are a live issue. I am not convinced that the law is adequate at the moment. What do you think about that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Pauline McNeill
Of course, we do not have control over the tech companies that we would like. There is controversy currently around how far the Online Safety Bill goes.
I noted what you said about how to deal with young people and how trauma can be the basis on which people’s behaviour is maybe what it should not be, but there is normalising in schools that is acceptable. Will you come back on that? That is the area in which I think there might need to be stronger messages in the law in relation to the sharing of images because, once images are shared, it is very difficult to get them back.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 31 May 2023
Pauline McNeill
I know that Stuart Allardyce might want to answer that question, but I will ask Detective Superintendent Martin MacLean what powers Police Scotland has to delete images. I am not even sure that that is in your jurisdiction. The issue is that there is a grey area around whether what we are talking about is actually contrary to the law, but are there any powers on the deletion of images?