The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1604 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 22 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
I am sorry—yes. She has had many jobs.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Thank you.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
It is when a case goes to the procurator fiscal that it can take up to six months, although the times are getting better.
I am thinking that complaints of assault against police officers must be quite common.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
We heard from the PIRC yesterday that it has a target of up to 90 days, and it seems to be meeting that.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Good morning. Thank you for your evidence; it has been helpful to hear it.
You have partially answered some of my questions, which are around time limits and getting the balance right. The committee does not have a lot of information about the categories of complaints against police officers—we are a wee bit in the dark—but there are two scenarios that I can think of. If we insisted that the Government attach time limits, would that undermine the provisions in the bill?
The idea of extending proceedings against former police officers up to 12 months, or beyond if the PIRC thought it was proportionate to do so, seems to be generally welcomed. However, those police officers might have sought other employment and gone on to new lives during that time. Notwithstanding what you said about the possible complexity of the cases, would setting some time limits undermine the new provision?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 16 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
I would have thought that those were quite simple matters to deal with, although I do not know. I am thinking about serving police officers. We have heard about many instances in which it has taken up to two years to deal with such matters. To me, as a layperson, it seems a simple matter that should not take two years. We are trying to strike the balance of fairness. Despite what you have said about the power of police officers, it seems an awful long time to have a case hanging over them, so time limits might be appropriate in simple cases.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
Thank you. Can you clarify something that you said to Sharon Dowey? This matter came up in previous evidence. In a particular case that the committee looked at, the police officer was, I think, suspended or put on restricted duties, and he was not allowed to know what the allegations against him were. The suggestion in that evidence session was that there might be legal reasons for that. What is the position on that?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
And, if you think there is a reasonable inference of criminality, that is where the PIRC—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
So, in all other cases, there is a certain standard of sufficiency that is applied, but, when it comes to police officers, you have to do something completely different. Is that not quite an odd approach for a prosecutor to deal with?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Pauline McNeill
I am trying to get my head around all the different categories of complaints and criminality that police officers might be accused of. You might have alluded to that earlier in response to one of my colleagues. I suppose that a typical example of a complaint might be when a member of the public says that excessive force was used in the middle of an arrest and that, in effect, they have been assaulted. Given that low test, is there not quite a fine line in those cases?