The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1213 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
This is a very important area of work for the minister and for the committee, when we are able to see the detail. In a short summary, could you clarify the objective of the changes to the victim notification scheme? How would you characterise the proposed changes?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
I am trying to understand. That is the change that you want to make to the current system—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
I understand. When will we see what the delivery model looks like?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
Right. Is that data sharing between the multiple organisations that are already involved and the victims?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
So it is not really that accessible at the moment.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
I am trying to understand what we are doing at stage 2. What changes are we making? I will get to the delivery model, which I want to ask you about. Would you characterise it as changing people’s experience? Will it be more supportive? What are you trying to achieve?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
You said that it is technical, so, even when we see it, we will not know which delivery model you are going for.
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
We will be asked to vote for the framework, and we will then hear which delivery model you have—
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 11 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
Okay, so it is quite tricky. You want to move at pace, and I can understand why, as there is a lot of interest in the matter. As a committee, we are certainly very interested in it, and we want to work with the Government. However, how soon after the implementation of the technical aspect at stage 2 will we see what the delivery model will look like?
Criminal Justice Committee
Meeting date: 4 December 2024
Pauline McNeill
I did not fully understand, Michael, what you meant when you addressed the question of reasonable doubt. The point was made to the committee recently that, if possible, we want a jury to act as a collective in coming to a conclusion. That is what we are aiming for, rather than it being a set of individuals who all vote. I had not considered that point previously, but now I think that it is really important.
Will you explain a bit more what you meant when you talked about what would happen if the jury thought that the accused probably did it, but there was reasonable doubt? I did not fully understand that point.