The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 125 contributions
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:As Fergus Ewing said, this is a much bigger issue. The amending of digital material is widespread. The BBC and other organisations that are supposed to be above reproach have altered digital material—the Donald Trump thing comes to mind. It is perhaps too big an issue for this committee can deal with. It requires a full review.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:As Fergus Ewing said, this is a much bigger issue. The amending of digital material is widespread. The BBC and other organisations that are supposed to be above reproach have altered digital material—the Donald Trump thing comes to mind. It is perhaps too big an issue for this committee can deal with. It requires a full review.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
In light of the moves that the Scottish Government has made, I suggest that we close the petition under rule 15.7 of standing orders, on the basis that certain categories of asylum seekers are already eligible to access the statutory national concessionary travel scheme and the Scottish Government has suggested that any long-term actions to extend the scheme to all asylum seekers will depend on the evaluation of the pilot that is currently under way.
In closing the petition, the committee could write to the Minister for Agriculture and Connectivity to highlight our concerns regarding the lack of clarity on whether concessionary travel will be available to all asylum seekers beyond March 2026. The committee could also highlight the option for the petitioners to submit an updated petition in the next parliamentary session, should they consider that the Scottish Government’s actions on the matter are not sufficient.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:It is quite a complex matter. As well as Scottish Water and the Scottish Environment Protection Agency, other agencies, such as planning authorities, are involved. I was quite involved with the issue when I worked in Glasgow, because it overlaps with other issues. Brock burn and the River Cart originate in the hills of East Renfrewshire, which is where the convener’s constituency is.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:That is because of the £10 million that I spent on upgrading the lower downstream.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 25 February 2026
Davy Russell
:Reasonable flood risk management plans are in place there, but they are a bit out of date because there has been much more rain in recent years. That is the real crux of the matter. The plans were probably just about fit for purpose, but the weather has slightly changed now. Previously, there would be a flood once in 100 years; now, there is about one in 30 years—perhaps it is even more frequent than that in some areas. It is quite a big exercise, but the approach needs to be focused rather than broad.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Davy Russell
I used to be responsible for this sort of thing in a former life, and what I would say is that this happens not just at the schools themselves. It happens for about half a mile on either side of them, given that a lot of children are part of the safer routes to school programme and are walking to school.
Other traffic-calming measures tend to be more effective than speed cameras, because drivers will speed up to the cameras, slow down once they know where they are, and then speed away again. There are numerous other measures such as sleeping policemen, chicanes and so on—you name it—that are probably more effective than speed cameras.
Cameras are tools that can be used in certain instances, but there are other traffic-calming measures that the police do not need to be consulted on, and which the roads authority, or whatever council it is, can put in place. If people want a speed camera to be put in, they need to consult and get agreement from the police authority. It might be easier for the petitioner to speak to his local authority and ask for an assessment of other traffic-calming measures.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Davy Russell
I have had a fair bit of correspondence from young mums about the issue. It is so difficult to get childcare, especially when a child is aged between nine months and three years. The cost and sometimes the locality—I have a big rural area in my constituency—are stopping parents from getting childcare, which prevents them from going back to work. If they went back to work, the financial cost of getting the childcare that their child deserves would far outweigh the financial benefits of going back to work. It is a big issue, and I have three or four current cases because of it.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Davy Russell
This is still one of the most commonsense suggestions. Local communities that have wind farms and even solar on their doorstep have to suffer the consequences, whether it is to scenic views or whatever, so I agree that they should have a say in what happens and a share of the profits.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 28 January 2026
Davy Russell
Bearing in mind that prostate cancer is one of the biggest killers of men, the petition deserves further consideration.