The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 210 contributions
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
Clearly, convener, it was the case—this is from the landlord’s own mouth—that there was no intention to end the lease, so it is very disappointing that that impression was given.
I will move on to the slightly wider issue of the production facilities at Dumbarton. It is not just “River City” that will end; all production will cease at Dumbarton as the lease is given up. The BBC seems to think that it can manage without permanent production facilities in Scotland, and it will not be permanently replacing the capacity that was afforded by the studios at Dumbarton. What do you think are the implications of that decision?
Constitution, Europe, External Affairs and Culture Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 15 May 2025
Jackie Baillie
I have a confession. I am not just the MSP for Dumbarton; I feel as if I am the de facto MSP for Shieldinch as well.
I had the benefit of speaking directly to the landlord because I knew who they were. To suggest that they were surprised that BBC Scotland indicated that it wanted to leave would perhaps be an understatement. They were expecting the lease to be renewed and had no plans to do anything other than to continue the lease. For whatever reason, it appears that the BBC was happy to have people believe that the decision was down to the actions of the landlord and not one that it made itself, which, frankly, is simply not true. Why do you think that it did that? Paul, do you want to go first?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
If I have picked you up correctly, you are saying that, with a fair wind, the timeline could be six years.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
I will try to be quick, convener.
The petitioners are in the public gallery; I think that they understand your reasoning, cabinet secretary, but they disagree with it. They were surprised to see reference in work package 1 to the requirement for a STAG appraisal. I do not know whether that was missed by officials.
I am interested in your views on whether the low road route is the best one in relation to traffic hold-ups. You will appreciate that the A82 is an extremely busy route. If you construct on the existing route, the hold-ups will be a nightmare. They will be catastrophic for the area. A high road is a better option. What analysis have you done of the resilience of roads and of the traffic disturbance that would be caused by sticking to the low route?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
Speedboats at the ready. [Laughter.]
10:45Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
Absolutely. My point is not that we are against road building but that there is a better alternative.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
Sorry.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
A freedom of information request.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
You are the source.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee (Draft)
Meeting date: 2 April 2025
Jackie Baillie
I think that the road outstrips us all.
The petitioners’ third petition, PE1916, calls for a public inquiry into the “political and financial mismanagement” of the A83. Things have moved on substantially, but I note that their first petition was lodged in 2012, so we have been at this for a long time, and we are at the foothills of something starting to happen. I think that we all appreciate the petitioners’ frustration.
In focusing on the future, could the cabinet secretary provide some indicative detail on how much money will be needed and when? I assume that you have profiled the capital. Assuming—touch wood—that the draft orders go through and that there are no objections or a requirement for a full inquiry, what will the likely timeline be?