Seòmar agus comataidhean

Could Professor Skea come in on that?

I thank you for your work on the commission and for your report, “A National Mission for a fairer, greener Scotland”. This committee’s wanting to hear from you in our second meeting is evidence of the importance that we place on a just transition.

I want to focus on industrial transitions. We know that the 2045 target will be tough and that the 2030 target is even tougher. You have talked about tensions. If we are to deliver on the targets, it might be imperative that we focus on one sector as opposed to another. How do you see the sectoral approach, given that you called for just transition plans in each sector? How do we raise the game for all sectors while trying to meet the targets?

I have a question for Dave Moxham, and Professor Skea may then want to come in. I know that other colleagues will want to come on to specific sectors, but I am interested in the “how” of delivery, given that skills and reskilling are central.

Over the past year, we have gone through an experience whereby we have probably had unprecedented work between unions and employers in dealing with the pandemic. That approach, of bringing employers and unions together to tackle this and to come up with skills transition, strikes me as something that could be very positive.

On the idea of mapping the different skills needed in different sectors, a lot of skills and retraining is very individualised now—a lot of private providers do it on that basis, and there is a lot of responsibility on individual workers in different sectors to do it themselves. How do we do that collectively? Dare I say it that historical vested interests are, understandably, involved in some aspects of the protection of the high standards that are necessary in different sectors for working in what are, quite often, very challenging circumstances. What is your advice on how we can make sure that, as part of those individual sectoral transitions, skills and retraining are developed in a way that is meaningful, bearing in mind that it looks as if money, resource and commitment are there? It is about the “how” and the delivery.

I thank Colin for teeing me up.

Hello everybody. As the first evidence session of this committee is in the realm of scoping and scene setting, and as the committee will be interested in the transition to net zero and the wellbeing economy, your responses and focus in those areas at this stage will—by necessity—have to be top line.

I am struck that we have heard that many businesses are still in survival mode. In addition, we have a planet that has to survive, and we heard in Michelle Thomson’s question about the debt issues that many small businesses are facing. That all comes at a time when, in order to achieve net zero, there will have to be investment in heat and transport and in relation to the demands of consumers for net zero delivery of services.

What practically can be done? How do we commit ourselves to the bigger, overarching Scottish agenda of that transition and wellbeing? What would be your messages to the committee, in order for us to focus on what can make a material change? Bearing in mind the gain that businesses will have in reduced costs in the long term, business investment might lend itself to interesting models of finance to help small businesses. However, how can that be done at the same time that businesses are trying to survive, when they are carrying a lot of debt?

Dave Moxham just spoke about some of that wider agenda, so I will come to him at the end to pick up on some of the issues that he did not cover in his last answer. I will go to Charandeep Singh first on that, then to Barry McCulloch, Rose Marley and Carolyn Currie.

Carolyn Currie can start, followed by Rose Marley.

Is it okay if we go through the other witnesses, convener?

I am conscious that this is a massive area, convener, so I suspect that people might be required to follow up in writing after the committee meeting.

Does Rose Marley have any top lines on that? Dave Moxham can then address anything that he did not cover in his answer to Colin Smith.

Given that we have to do all this—although perhaps at a different pace in different sectors—how are we going to pay for it? Chris Stark talked about investment in budgets by the Scottish Government, and I appreciate the advice on what we and indeed the UK Government should be looking for in order to get underneath that investment. However, the committee chair mentioned that most of the investment required will need to come from the private sector. What does that mean in the Scottish context, if most of the investment in technology to meet UK targets has to come from Scotland?

I was struck by an earlier comment by Chris Stark. If the world can mobilise to carry out fiscal transfers and, I assume, quantitative easing for the Covid emergency, why can it not do something similar in relation to the climate emergency? What is your view of the prospect of success at COP26? What is your benchmark for success, bearing in mind the question of why, if the world can move and has moved so much on the Covid emergency, it could not do it on the climate emergency?