The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1524 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Fiona Hyslop
Clearly, in some areas—perhaps more for offshore projects, because planning is devolved, although energy policy is reserved—we might want to pursue clarification on who would decide where the mitigations would be because the consenting should be devolved.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Fiona Hyslop
That is interesting. From what I have heard, it sounds as though it would be possible to piggyback on EU applications, but you would be reliant on the information that the applicant provided to the EU, as opposed to the approvals database—is that correct?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Fiona Hyslop
How does that compare with the EU’s progress and pace in approvals—or, indeed, non-approvals? How will the delays that we are hearing about impact the Scottish Government’s ability to keep pace with the EU on that?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Fiona Hyslop
David, what are your views on the interaction between the bill, the LCM on which we are looking at, and the draft NPF4?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Fiona Hyslop
I am trying to understand the matter from a practical point of view. What will it mean for projects, in particular? I turn to Robbie Calvert for an answer next. Although there are some concerns about the provisions on environmental outcomes reports, you can see a sense in them from a policy point of view. However, who would make the decision on large onshore—or even, potentially, offshore—developments that environmental assessment has shown need some kind of mitigation when that mitigation might not be able to happen on a granular, small scale but will happen elsewhere? Under the bill, would a Scottish minister or the secretary of state decide where the mitigation for the environmental outcome would take place? That is a practical situation that could happen.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 4 October 2022
Fiona Hyslop
But you would be reliant on the applicant as opposed to the approvals database.
On the volume of work, what discussions has the Scottish Government had with the UK Government about how it ensures that the HSE is sufficiently resourced to carry out its functions in this area effectively and to reduce delays in processing authorisations under the GB biocidal product regulatory regime?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Fiona Hyslop
That is very clear. Thank you very much.
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Fiona Hyslop
We are doing pre-budget scrutiny and we want to put women at the centre. It is perhaps an understatement to say that there is volatility in the economy and the fiscal situation as we speak. Therefore, budgets will be tough. I hear you saying that you want mainstreaming, but you also want targeting, and it would be helpful if you could unpack that.
Budgets will be tight. What is already there that you want to keep? It may be at risk, because everything will be looked at. Ideally, everyone wants more money, but that will be a challenge. What would your priorities be? What is already happening that you would say is a priority to keep? Could you explain your position on mainstreaming and targeting a wee bit more, because there is a bit of a contradiction there?
Economy and Fair Work Committee
Meeting date: 28 September 2022
Fiona Hyslop
That is extremely helpful. Would it be reasonable to say that we need to be pressing the Government on getting better value for the public purse from women’s contributions? That is a good economic argument, because the benefits of having more women being successful will have a disproportionate impact on tackling inequality. In a tight budget, that in itself will provide value from existing budgets.
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee
Meeting date: 27 September 2022
Fiona Hyslop
I previously launched the green investment portfolio and it was primarily private sector propositions at that point. It would be helpful to the committee if you have any examples of public sector, council-led propositions that are part of that portfolio now.
We have concerns, however, as councils are telling us that they would carry the risk for such joint propositions and they are of some scale, as a result of propositions being brought together. Also, most of them are probably city based, so what are we doing to help the smaller local authorities access this portfolio of investments that we know is available? How do we help smaller local authorities and what can we do to help to de-risk the activity for local authorities embarking on putting forward an investable proposition?