The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 230 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning. It has been a really interesting discussion. I have to admit that I have just been looking up your briefing papers on human rights budgeting to try to get it into my head. I might take you up on the offer to meet you separately to go through some of that, because I am struggling a wee bit to understand how human rights come into the national performance framework and national outcomes and then into delivery within the financial envelope that we have. I hope that, one day, I will get my head around it.
My question is about the Scottish household survey. Interestingly, there was broad satisfaction across Scotland, in rural and urban areas, with services such as schools and health, although the satisfaction rates for public transport in rural areas were suggested to be worse.
How did you factor other surveys, such as the Scottish household survey, into your research? Do you have any comments on the comparison between your work and the household survey?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
In fairness, I think that Rhoda Grant said at the very beginning of her question that none of us doubts the outcome that we are trying to get—which is incentivising business, helping us to be more sustainable and so on—and that it is just about how it works in practice and making sure that it becomes not a burden to the agriculture industry but, rather, a positive thing. It is important to monitor that all the way through.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
That is because it is messy.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
Perhaps I have not explained myself well. My point is about the rural support plan, not about the detail. I thought that the idea behind the rural support plan was that it would underpin all the new grant schemes and that it would be a document that showed the Scottish Government’s outcomes so that farmers could apply for support that fits the outcomes that you are looking for. Without that document, it feels as if we cannot do that, because your route map does not give that level of detail.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
I—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
I do not want to come off as negative this morning, minister—I agree with you on some of this stuff, but I want to press you on the clarity and detail of the vision. The list of measures under tier 2 is expansive, and one of the arguments against the current greening model is that it is restrictive. In my head, I have the old land managers options scheme, whereby people could pick and choose what worked for them, exactly as you said. Do you have an idea of how those measures will be delivered in the new model?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
I have a quick question on the cost of that work. Minister, what do you estimate the potential cost of any changes to the IT system will be? For clarity, is that money already in the budget? Do you know where the money would come from for any changes?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
I do not dispute that that is the overall aim and, potentially, one of the benefits of technology, but history tells us that these things can cost a huge amount of money. I am looking for a commitment that that will not be taken out of the existing agricultural budgets and that, if money is needed for technology, it will be provided separately—or that that will be a separate budget discussion.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
I get that and I am very sympathetic to it; it is a much better way of doing things. It is good to get clarity that that is the vision.
This is a technical point: we have had NVZs—nitrate vulnerable zones—for years and we have had to work out calculations about them. That was based on the fact that, in the old days, fertiliser was cheap, huge amounts of fertilising went on and there was pollution of water courses. That is not so true now. Is the code of practice likely to supersede the NVZ system? I imagine that the code of practice will say something about nutrient management. Is that system outdated now, or are you likely to continue NVZs in the future?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 19 February 2025
Tim Eagle
I want to pick up on a couple of points about the code. You say that there has been feedback from all those people. Is that feedback publicly available, or is it feedback that comes to you but that we cannot see, read or hear about?