The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 230 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay—fine. Thank you.
I will go back to the point that Norman Munro made a minute ago about the statutory duty being changed from “have regard to” to “facilitate the implementation of”. What will that mean in practice for a local authority or other public body in a national park area?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
What is the thinking behind that? Let us say that I am a councillor sitting on one of our wonderful councils and a national park covers part of my ward, and I am struggling for cash. Currently, when I get a paper that covers part of the national park area, I would have regard to the plan—I think that I understand what it is trying to do and that I have to go in a certain direction. However, under the bill, I will have to facilitate the implementation of that plan. That might have an economic or financial consequence, or it might have a consequence for what I can do on planning, education or anything else. Will you develop that a little more and say what you expect the local government lawyers to say to that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay. I think that I understand. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
In your mind, then, this is just the addition of a word, and it does not make any real difference to NatureScot. One could argue whether it is required at all.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
What is the primary motivation for changing the authorisation system for taking or killing deer during the close season or at night or by using vehicles? How will it help with deer management in Scotland, which is one of the fundamental aims of this section of the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
In the 1996 act, the term is just “competent”, but in the bill it is “fit and competent”. What does the addition of “fit” mean? I presume that you do not want to decrease the number of stalkers that we have in Scotland, because we need them to carry on. Are you considering things such as grandfather rights for those people who are clearly able and have been doing that work for a long time?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
The argument is that the landscape is quite crowded and complex. Would it have been better to rethink all of that? Could that have been done in the bill to make things easier?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
I am talking about the proposed new section 1(2).
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Tim Eagle
I think that my question has just been answered. I was going to ask what response you have had from the Scottish Government and what your big summary message to us is. You have just said that it is not just the Scottish Government but all of us as MSPs, in representing our constituents, who have a responsibility to be pushing and questioning and constantly asking. Unless there is anything else that you want to add, I think that you just summarised the situation.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 26 February 2025
Tim Eagle
It is an interesting point that we hide smaller groups because of a bigger subset. Perhaps I made the wrong assumption, but I thought that we would factor that into such research. However, your evidence is that we do not. Your research allowed smaller groups to have a voice, which otherwise they might not have had. It might not even be in Inverness. Elgin or Dingwall, for example, have slightly larger populations that are significantly bigger than west coast villages with a handful of people.