The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 693 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
I am talking about the proposed new section 1(2).
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay—fine. Thank you.
I will go back to the point that Norman Munro made a minute ago about the statutory duty being changed from “have regard to” to “facilitate the implementation of”. What will that mean in practice for a local authority or other public body in a national park area?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
What is the thinking behind that? Let us say that I am a councillor sitting on one of our wonderful councils and a national park covers part of my ward, and I am struggling for cash. Currently, when I get a paper that covers part of the national park area, I would have regard to the plan—I think that I understand what it is trying to do and that I have to go in a certain direction. However, under the bill, I will have to facilitate the implementation of that plan. That might have an economic or financial consequence, or it might have a consequence for what I can do on planning, education or anything else. Will you develop that a little more and say what you expect the local government lawyers to say to that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay. I think that I understand. Thank you.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
In your mind, then, this is just the addition of a word, and it does not make any real difference to NatureScot. One could argue whether it is required at all.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Do you have any thoughts at this point on what that would be?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
What is the primary motivation for changing the authorisation system for taking or killing deer during the close season or at night or by using vehicles? How will it help with deer management in Scotland, which is one of the fundamental aims of this section of the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
In the 1996 act, the term is just “competent”, but in the bill it is “fit and competent”. What does the addition of “fit” mean? I presume that you do not want to decrease the number of stalkers that we have in Scotland, because we need them to carry on. Are you considering things such as grandfather rights for those people who are clearly able and have been doing that work for a long time?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
I want to try to get a little more clarity on the deer management plans and how they will operate. Out of curiosity, do you see them as, in effect, the same as the deer management nature restoration orders? How are they different, if that makes sense?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
That is the question that I am asking. There might be a plan in place, but, at some point, NatureScot might decide that the plan is not delivering what it wants. At that point, can there be a period of discussion before any further process is needed? NatureScot might come back at that point and say, “We still disagree with you,” but is there a process by which the landowner can provide evidence to NatureScot?
I am asking, in effect, whether there is an appeals process. Does the landowner have the power to disagree, or do they just have to do what NatureScot says?