The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 693 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Sorry, convener, but I should declare an interest before someone shouts at me later. I have a small farm.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning. It has been a fascinating 45 minutes, and I now have hundreds of questions running through my head like crazy. It is startling that, as we progress with the agricultural route map, we are two years out from significant changes but everybody round this table is saying that ARIOB has not delivered.
My initial concern with ARIOB was always about whether the people on it were being listened to. Like Jonnie Hall and Kate Rowell, I understand that we have hundreds of years of experience on that panel, but that is not being taken through.
The issue that has come up probably more than anything else this morning is the computer system. The IT system is just not able to deliver. As Jim Walker said, he wrote a report—it was a good report, all of which could have been implemented to take the industry on a 10-year journey. Just how worried should I be that we do not have the infrastructure in place in the background to deliver all the stuff that we are talking about, whether it be the top priorities in the Agriculture and Rural Communities (Scotland) Act 2024 or what is coming in the rural support plan? Should we be speaking about that at the highest level?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Tim Eagle
On 19 February, the minister, Jim Fairlie, spoke to us about that very subject. He was asked directly about the money and support that were in place. He said:
“I am confident that the people who are doing the work that we require them to do will deliver it for us.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 19 February 2025; c 25.]
When I asked the head of the IT department what funding was in place, she was unaware of whether there was any funding in place.
In my view, I am right in thinking that there is a significant concern there. The issue is not all about the IT system, but, fundamentally, that is the delivery mechanism through which we get support out.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Tim Eagle
You have talked it up now. [Laughter.] I had better deliver it well. It is quite a specific question. We have spoken about where we are trying to get to with emissions reduction targets. In the context of Scottish agricultural policy, are you confident that we have in place the specific metrics and benchmarks to measure progress, or would you like to see more?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Can we sum all that up in a yes or no answer? Are we on track to meet the target of a 39 per cent reduction in emissions by 2040?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Tim Eagle
No.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Tim Eagle
I said 2040.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
That is the exact question that I was about to ask.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Perhaps I am wrong about this, but my understanding is that NatureScot has a range of things it can look at when considering deer management, but the word “environment” has now been put in. What does that mean to a land manager? If NatureScot can come and say that you must have regard to the environment before you put in place a deer management plan or it can force you to do X, Y and Z, what does that look like to a land manager on the ground? That is my understanding, at least. The word “environment” is a new addition, is it not?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
The argument is that the landscape is quite crowded and complex. Would it have been better to rethink all of that? Could that have been done in the bill to make things easier?