The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 230 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning. It has been a fascinating 45 minutes, and I now have hundreds of questions running through my head like crazy. It is startling that, as we progress with the agricultural route map, we are two years out from significant changes but everybody round this table is saying that ARIOB has not delivered.
My initial concern with ARIOB was always about whether the people on it were being listened to. Like Jonnie Hall and Kate Rowell, I understand that we have hundreds of years of experience on that panel, but that is not being taken through.
The issue that has come up probably more than anything else this morning is the computer system. The IT system is just not able to deliver. As Jim Walker said, he wrote a report—it was a good report, all of which could have been implemented to take the industry on a 10-year journey. Just how worried should I be that we do not have the infrastructure in place in the background to deliver all the stuff that we are talking about, whether it be the top priorities in the Agriculture and Rural Communities (Scotland) Act 2024 or what is coming in the rural support plan? Should we be speaking about that at the highest level?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Tim Eagle
On 19 February, the minister, Jim Fairlie, spoke to us about that very subject. He was asked directly about the money and support that were in place. He said:
“I am confident that the people who are doing the work that we require them to do will deliver it for us.”—[Official Report, Rural Affairs and Islands Committee, 19 February 2025; c 25.]
When I asked the head of the IT department what funding was in place, she was unaware of whether there was any funding in place.
In my view, I am right in thinking that there is a significant concern there. The issue is not all about the IT system, but, fundamentally, that is the delivery mechanism through which we get support out.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Sorry, convener, but I should declare an interest before someone shouts at me later. I have a small farm.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 March 2025
Tim Eagle
I think that we have that information. It was several hundred million pounds.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
That is the exact question that I was about to ask.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Perhaps I am wrong about this, but my understanding is that NatureScot has a range of things it can look at when considering deer management, but the word “environment” has now been put in. What does that mean to a land manager? If NatureScot can come and say that you must have regard to the environment before you put in place a deer management plan or it can force you to do X, Y and Z, what does that look like to a land manager on the ground? That is my understanding, at least. The word “environment” is a new addition, is it not?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
You do not foresee the process being used very much.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
What is the process? It is quite subjective, is it not, around the nature restoration stuff? If NatureScot says that it is not happy, so it wants a plan, will there be a move straight to a plan or can there be a period of discussion before a plan needs to be made? Can NatureScot say, “If you do this, we probably won’t need to go to that extent,” or does there have to be a jump straight to a plan? What happens if the landowner says, “Actually, I think that we are doing everything”? What evidence could they supply to NatureScot in saying, “We disagree with you here—we think that we are abiding by what you require of us”?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
The overarching aims also include conserving and enhancing an area’s “natural and cultural heritage” and promoting “sustainable use” and management of natural areas, and those are also among the six new aims that are set out in section 1(2). However, economic development is not specifically referred to.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 March 2025
Tim Eagle
Perhaps I am missing the point and you felt that some of the aims needed to be expanded on. I look at the six new aims and think that they are already inbuilt in the original four. However, as we take evidence from various bodies, it will be interesting to know whether they look at the aims and think, “We don’t need to talk more about this, because it is there and clear.” We will find that out as we go forward.