The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 628 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Tim Eagle
Is that what you mean by the phrase
“land-based inspection and analysis system”?
It is a kind of multilateral—
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Tim Eagle
Okay. Thank you very much.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Tim Eagle
I think that you have undermined them. With hindsight, do you think that it was a bit of a mistake to put this change into the budget in the way that you did, without having any discussion with the sector before that?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 21 January 2026
Tim Eagle
I do not have a particularly big problem with the regulations, but I want to clarify a couple of things, if that is all right. There were a lot of individuals who responded to the consultation—we do not know who they are—but a lot of the groups that responded were concerned with welfare. Are you comfortable that the consultation reached all the sectors that the regulations will affect?
11:30
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Tim Eagle
I want to ask one more question. We have had the minister at the committee a couple of times. I do not want to get too political, but he will often say, “Oh, if you could see what’s happening down in England—it’s all a disaster.” However, England has made a very big change, as has Wales, for that matter. Constitutional question aside, and whether or not you agree with everything that they are doing, do you see the fact that they have made a big change as positive? Has Scotland held itself back by not being prepared to make a big change?
I am not saying that I agree with that, by the way. I am just curious to hear your thoughts.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Tim Eagle
My question is pretty similar to the one about livestock, only it is about fertilisers. The climate change draft plan talks about reducing emissions by reducing fertiliser usage, but does the plan contain enough information on how we can achieve that? Is there anything additional that you think should have been in there?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Tim Eagle
I see this as quite an important point. We might all say that we are happy to move in the right direction, but what if there is some confusion? What if this has happened because, as we heard from the first panel, the relationship between a couple of groups was too close? It is important to work out, politically, what the stumbling block is. Is it a matter of will, or is it our ability to actually do this through the IT system? Do you accept that that is quite an important distinction to work out, so that we can push in the right direction?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Tim Eagle
My question is probably aimed at Professor Reay, given some of the work that he has been involved in. It appears that there is no just transition indicator for the agriculture sector or, perhaps more widely, rural communities. Is that a glaring omission in the plan?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Tim Eagle
We are talking about the climate change plan, but I am acutely conscious of greening. Quite a lot of money is involved in tier 2 direct support payments for greening.
What are your thoughts on that, including with regard to the whole-farm plan? I take on board what Ariane Burgess said about the usefulness of the documents that we are producing. How much of a living document are those really? They feed into the climate change plan and shape our environmental future.
We were talking about this sort of stuff with a bunch of young farmers that we had in yesterday. For example, greening is not ideal for all places, including an island such as Orkney. To what extent are the changes that are being made in that regard helping us to deliver this environmental future, or do you not think that they are as flexible as they should be, if that makes sense?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 14 January 2026
Tim Eagle
I have a quick supplementary question for David McKay. I have never really understood why this was the case, but my understanding is that there was a package of measures that would have helped—I am sure that I saw it on an Excel spreadsheet—but the measures were never implemented. In fact, greening has gone in a completely different direction.
Do you know why the measures were not implemented? Obviously, there was talk about the information technology system, but I do not know whether you know if that was the block. I am curious to know why what came out has never transpired as reality on the ground.