The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 403 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Tim Eagle
Yes, but in previous bills, that aspect has been made explicit, whereas in this bill, we are talking about a general duty. Does this represent a change in approach in bills as we move forward?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Tim Eagle
I remind members that I am a small farmer and that I previously worked for Scottish Land & Estates. That is in my entry in the register of members’ interests, but I wanted to ensure that everyone is aware of that this morning.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Tim Eagle
Scottish Land & Estates has written to the committee with concerns about the consultation, saying that the bill contains aspects that could significantly affect not just some of its clients but the agricultural sector more broadly. I guess that this brings us back to your earlier point: you are absolutely right that we do not need full public consultation, but the bill should at least contain a guarantee to anybody who is going to be affected by any secondary legislation that the interested parties will be consulted. Are you averse to bringing forward such a provision at a later stage of the bill?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Tim Eagle
I have a quick question. I am still trying to get my head around a lot of this, because the problem, in relation to both the agriculture bill that you mentioned and this one, is that significant changes could happen—there is uncertainty around prohibition, modification of land, right to buy and so on. What happens in the background? Is there a set of requirements that you must consider for you to say, “Yes, that is balanced and we can take that power”? Do you have to follow a set of rules in order to come up with something that is balanced?
You have mentioned balance a lot but, from my point of view, I am not sure that the bill is balanced, because too much is left to secondary legislation that will not be appropriately scrutinised. Is there a flow chart that you must follow that can give you the assurance that, in your own minds, what you are proposing is balanced?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 17 September 2024
Tim Eagle
Okay—that is fine. I think that that covers all my questions.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 10 September 2024
Tim Eagle
I just want to draw to the committee’s attention an issue relating to Scottish statutory instrument 2024/218. Although I have no problems with the SSI, a 62.5 per cent increase in cost, from £5 million to £8 million, is predicted, and I wonder whether it is worth flagging that to the lead committee. Although the cost is spread over a broad base, it is important that we look at that, ultimately, for those who have to pay it.
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 11 June 2024
Tim Eagle
I am happy to take those items in private, but I just want to declare an interest in relation to item 6, which is on the Agriculture and Rural Communities (Scotland) Bill, in that I am a farmer and have received basic payment support.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Tim Eagle
Okay—it is just that I have amendment 157 in front of me.
Amendment 139 moved—[Tim Eagle].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Tim Eagle
I agree with the minister’s point and therefore will not move the amendment.
Amendment 143 not moved.
Amendments 201, 51 and 52 moved—[Ariane Burgess]—and agreed to.
Amendment 6 moved—[Mairi Gougeon]—and agreed to.
Amendment 53 not moved.
Amendment 7 moved—[Rhoda Grant]—and agreed to.
10:15Amendment 144 moved—[Beatrice Wishart]—and agreed to.
Amendment 145 moved—[Rhoda Grant].
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee
Meeting date: 15 May 2024
Tim Eagle
Good morning. Amendment 157 would place a reporting requirement on ministers to assess the performance of functions delegated by ministers within a year of the bill coming into force. The intention behind amendment 157 is to ensure that organisations to which functions of the bill have been delegated are held accountable for their performance. It would provide a means of tracking their progress on key functions of the bill and would offer ministers the opportunity to assess whether delegation was the correct approach.
We know how important accountability is for the effective operation of legislation. Amendment 157 would improve the level of accountability in relation to not only ministers but all stakeholders who were involved in implementing the bill’s provisions.