The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 324 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning. I want to go back to Evelyn Tweed’s point about the duty on public bodies. Something that was just expressed and which has been picked up on a lot in evidence is that the duty has just not worked—it has not been taken forward in the way that we wanted.
I am conscious—I think that this is hot off the press—that the Environment (Principles, Governance and Biodiversity Targets) (Wales) Bill has recently been introduced. That bill has some interesting ideas about how—I have written it down—the Welsh Government will create a statement that will inform public bodies how they have to comply with the duty. The bill will give the Welsh Government the power to designate a public body to meet a particular target, impact, or whatever it might be. Did you have any cross-Government discussions with the Welsh Government on what it is doing? Are those things that you might consider doing here, in Scotland?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Is the intention to feed that into the code of practice?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I am thinking about the risk.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
You talked earlier about good will—and I will come back to that, because I think that you do have good will—but there is a risk that things such as nature restoration or vague terms such as “have regard to” risk undermining it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
If stakeholders do not feel that that is the case, why would you not consider slightly strengthening that wording in the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
It is important to place on record that you foresee that dialogue and that relationship happening. You have already said as much, but I just want to the point to be clarified.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I have a quick question about the business and regulatory impact assessment, which, as far as I am aware, has not yet been published. When will that be coming?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Actually, convener, can I come in later with question 17? I think that my supplementary question relates to that.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Okay.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I get that you think that the protections are robust, but all the evidence that we have heard suggests that many others do not think that they are. What are your thoughts on changing that?
To go back to the question that I inadvertently asked earlier, you consulted last year on adapting and improving the habitat regulations. That consultation had two elements: one was around creating more flexibility to designate a site based on an ecosystem or habitat approach, and the other was about encouraging more proactive management. What did you learn from the consultation? You have not brought anything into the bill from that consultation, so what came out of it that led you to instead move to take this broad power?