The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 324 contributions
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Oh. Where was I meant to be?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Is there any particular circumstance, though? Does anything spring to mind?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Can you give me a case study? What is a practical example on the ground of what might happen on an estate or a lowland setting?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Just out of interest, I wonder whether you have given any thought to asking your officials to work on the code of practice now, so that we can have a draft before stage 3 and scrutinise it before the end of the bill proceedings. It is quite an important document.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I am conscious of the time, but I want to quickly touch on an issue. My understanding is that, if there is a control scheme in place, it is registered against the title to the land. We have heard in evidence that that could potentially create a burden on the land, which would transfer if it were sold. Have you given any thought to the potential effects on land value and marketability?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Rather than go down the non-regression route, REACH offers a slightly different route, which has a very clearly defined scope for the core aims and protected provisions and how the powers can be used. What is your current thinking about how you might adapt that part of the bill to better reflect the evidence that we have heard?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Sorry. My problem is that I skipped a question because you brought me in earlier, convener, on question 8. I retract the question that I asked and will come back to it in about an hour’s time.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Cabinet secretary, I appreciate your offer for anyone to come and talk to you at any time. I am sure that we will all work on amendments for stage 2, but, ahead of that, what are we learning? As a Government, what are you seeing in some of the ENGOs and others’ responses about the powers as they are laid out in the bill?
There has been quite a lot of talk about non-regression. The Scottish Parliament information centre quite helpfully pointed out that there is something called the registration, evaluation, authorisation and restriction of chemicals regulations. I do not know if you are familiar with those changes to chemical regulations.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
I have a final question, because I know that we need to move on.
I accept that point but, as I said in connection with the REACH example, which SPICe helpfully pointed out, there are other methods of doing that that do not specifically involve non-regression.
That takes me back to the question that I asked a second ago. It will be unhelpful if we do not talk about this again until all the amendments come flying in at stage 2. I presume that, over the coming weeks, you will have a discussion with your team about how you can widen the approach—I do not know whether you have had that conversation yet. I think that, based on the evidence that we have taken, that is what we are generally looking for. If you can come back to the committee with information about what you could do, that would be useful, because it would give us time to think about it.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Tim Eagle
Good morning, minister. I have a quick question on reviews of compliance with the code of practice. As I understand it, the bill sets out that the Scottish Government can request a review at any point. In what circumstances do you foresee that happening?