Skip to main content

Language: English / Gàidhlig

Loading…

Chamber and committees

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Filter your results Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 5 May 2021
  6. Current session: 12 May 2021 to 2 May 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 230 contributions

|

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Tim Eagle

Peatland.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Tim Eagle

Do you mean the first question that I asked?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Tim Eagle

I will throw in one more thing. I think that you said that you will look to the future and monitor the scheme, and I guess that you would want to, because I presume that we would all want to see our island and crofting communities, as well as our traditional agricultural communities, thrive. You spoke about the calf payment going up. Is the money for the Scottish suckler beef support scheme ring fenced?

09:30  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Tim Eagle

On the future of voluntary coupled support, am I correct that that will run up to 2028?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Tim Eagle

Yes. I just wanted to check that the cow could come back in. If someone had a pedigree cow with great genetics, they could keep that on and, ultimately, it would get the payment again.

Rhoda Grant’s point is significant. We have full-time farmers who can drive efficiency and change. We see that a lot in our industry. As we saw in London yesterday, farmers are really trying to push forward and want to work with Governments. However, we also have lifestyle farming. We see that on the west coast, on the islands and in our crofting communities, where the farmer often works away on other jobs.

The SRUC evidence suggests that the calving intervals are less likely to be met in some of our more crofting communities. We do not want to risk further pushing away the herd in those areas. The statistics suggest that the herd is going down quicker on our island communities.

What thought have you given to that, minister? If we were to approve the regulations and we were to see significantly less issue on the islands, would you be prepared to come back and say that we might need to tailor a specific scheme to help our islands and crofters?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Tim Eagle

Okay—I see what you mean. That is fine; thank you.

09:45  

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Tim Eagle

My question was on that point. I was looking at the evidence, and it is a very difficult issue, is it not? I get Rhoda Grant’s point that farming varies quite significantly across Scotland. If we are talking about the north-east corner of Scotland, we can argue that there are traditional spring and autumn calving herds. Therefore, the spring calving herd is potentially more likely to meet the 410-day threshold, whereas the autumn calving herd might not—or a lower proportion of them would meet that.

Is there a risk that management changes in the long term might involve a shift more towards spring calving? What effect might that have in relation to stock coming to market? I am not suggesting that that will happen, but I am curious about whether that has been factored into any of your discussions. It sounds as though it has.

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Tim Eagle

Good morning. I have a few questions. The first is a point of clarification. If a cow slips and goes over the calving interval and then has a calf, there will not be a payment for that calf but, if the cow has a calf in future within the 410 days, there will be a payment. Is that correct?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Tim Eagle

That was on heifer calves. That is fine, because they get the payment. In the second year, if a calf is born within 410 days, it attracts the payment. If that cow then slipped—if it did not have a calf that year but had one the following year—that would then not get the payment, because it would be outwith the 410 days. It would be 600 days or whatever. However, if it had a calf the following year within the 410 days, that would get the payment again. Is that correct?

Rural Affairs and Islands Committee

Subordinate Legislation

Meeting date: 20 November 2024

Tim Eagle

What are your thoughts on what will happen post that date? You are introducing the scheme now, but we are only three or four years off that date. What would that support look like in future? Will the scheme carry on? What will any scheme for voluntary coupled support look like?