Seòmar agus comataidhean

I would like to get on. Is it about the veterinary agreement? [Interruption.] Is this a benefit?

That was more of a speech, and it was not really worth it. When you think of the tax that is now being levied on the whisky industry, which the sector is up in arms about, and the levies that the USA is about—[Interruption.] I am coming to the lovely Tories. As I was saying, 10 to 20 per cent tariffs on whisky exports to the USA might be coming. I cannot see that as a benefit of Brexit.

I return to the veterinary agreement, which Tim Eagle did not want me to talk about. Such an agreement would ensure that UK and EU standards were equivalent or aligned. That is important for animal welfare, the biosecurity of plants and so on. The Labour Party made a manifesto commitment to pursue such an agreement, which would aid a new trading relationship with the EU. For many years, the Scottish Government has called for a comprehensive veterinary and sanitary and phytosanitary agreement, which would substantially reduce the barriers to trade that have been put in place following Brexit. I hear that the cabinet secretary is hopeful that that will come to pass. Let us watch this space.

I have lost my speech now—excuse me a minute. I never should tamper with technology. Oh, something strange has appeared. I will go back to it.

I am going to. I have a paper back-up.

I have not had time to mention national insurance or agricultural property tax relief. That would have been an attack on Labour—it deserves it, too.

When it comes to the good news, I have a problem. While any Government in this Parliament has to rely on the bulk of its budget coming from Westminster, while macroeconomic policies such as national insurance and inheritance tax are reserved and while the UK Government has ruled out rejoining the EU in any shape or form, there is very little good news on Brexit until we are—here is the word that the Tories like—independent and can rejoin the EU. Frankly, I agree with George Osborne and his dire predictions.

Oh, Mr Eagle is going to tell me a benefit—good.

Interestingly, my letting you make an intervention, Mr Hoy, was predicated on your giving me a benefit of Brexit, but, as usual, you neatly avoided that.

I note that 26 per cent of Scotland’s economy is rural.

I was a secondary school teacher long, long ago. Is there a role for teachers in that regard? They often identify changes in the behaviour of children in their classes. Is there a role for primary and secondary school teachers, simply by being aware that the issue might be one factor that they might not otherwise think about? They might think of other types of abuse, but perhaps not that one.

Like Mark Ruskell, I think that this is an interesting and important topic, given the £500 million of damage that is caused to the environment per year by the species in question. First, though, I thank Audrey Nicoll for bringing the debate to the chamber, not least because I have learned that Jackie Baillie is a defender of ancient woodlands. Her talents are extensive.

Invasive species are, as we know, introduced either directly or indirectly by man. Trade, transport, travel and tourism can move species around the world. Many species have been introduced intentionally for commercial purposes, such as for ornamental gardening, for farming or for forestry or as pets, only to escape and become established in the wild. Other species simply hitchhike, moving to new countries via people and transport. The most recent hitchhiker I can think of was a scorpion that had innocently taken shelter in a pair of trainers ordered online. The lesson is this: we should check inside our shoes, just in case. I once found a dead mouse in one of mine.

But I digress. It is easy for invaders to move around in a world of international trade, at both private level and commercial level, but I want to talk about plants. Plants or seeds that we buy from the garden centre will have undergone tests and certification that are pretty stringent and which have become even more stringent since our leaving the European Union. Before, there would have been, as I understand it, one biosecurity certification at the point of departure; now there is one from the EU export source, one on arrival in the UK and another at the wholesaler. That all comes with additional costs, which are all passed on to the consumer.

The issue was raised at a recent meeting of the cross-party group on gardening and horticulture, of which I am a member. Indeed, a joint letter from the Fresh Produce Consortium and the Horticultural Trades Association called for a meeting with the UK Government over the continued problems that their members face when importing plants, including trees and cut flowers, under the current border system. Notwithstanding that, biosecurity is crucial, and it is endorsed by the HTA.

However, some plants have escaped in the past and are now invading. Some have already been mentioned, but I will repeat a couple of them. The notorious Japanese knotweed, which was once considered an ornamental garden plant, has become established in woodlands, on riverbanks and in coastal areas. Its dispersal is due to both deliberate and inadvertent human activity, as a result of which fragments of the aggressive root system get washed downstream, spread and propagate, changing the habitat structure of riverbanks and thereby impacting on biodiversity, ecosystem structure, conservation efforts and even salmon fisheries. I recall seeing the plant with more friendly eyes some decades ago as it flourished along the riverbank at the bottom of my garden, before we knew that it was up to mischief.

Rhododendron ponticum—the purple rhody—is another non-native garden escapee plant that has become established and has spread across large swathes of Scotland, overwhelming other plants and preventing natural woodland regeneration. Again, I can recall seeing that in my youth just a few decades ago, when it was thought to be really pretty. How times have changed—and it is not the first or last example of a plant moving from being admired to being despised.

Then there is the American skunk cabbage, which is, yes, skunk by name and skunk by nature. It is very smelly. Years ago, when I visited Dawyck botanic garden near Peebles, which is one of the Royal Botanic Garden Edinburgh’s gardens, I thought that the yellow flowers growing in the streams were stinky, although that could be overlooked, because they were beautiful, and I selected one from the gift shop. A few years later, the Royal Horticultural Society told me to destroy it.

I thank Audrey Nicoll for bringing the debate to the chamber. I have found the research engrossing as well as worrying. Grey squirrels are more infamous, through no fault of their own—we brought them in—but we must also consider seeds, plants and the wee beasties that travel on them.

Minnigaff.

The First Minister will be aware that, without any notice to the Scottish Government, NHS Lothian has withdrawn its share of funding for the Veterans First Point service—some £200,000 or thereabouts—thereby leaving the Scottish Government alone to fund it. As Glencorse barracks is in my constituency, I am aware of how vital that specialised service is for veterans, to whom it provides mental and emotional support, both through professional interventions and with the help of peers. Does the First Minister agree that that is a very wrong decision on the part of NHS Lothian, which seems particularly cruel and thoughtless as we approach remembrance day?

The policy memorandum to the Housing (Scotland) Bill states:

“the Bill has no significant differential effects upon island or rural communities”.

I represent rural communities. The statement says that the Government will say where a rent control is in place and how rents will be capped. There is a very different problem in rural areas when they are compared with urban areas. How will the bill take account of rurality?