Seòmar agus comataidhean

I congratulate the member on securing the debate, which focuses on the people whom one might term the unsung of the health service. Indeed, I suspect that, if members were to mention to someone at the bus stop that they were speaking in a debate applauding the contribution of allied health professionals, many would find that that person did not know who they were talking about. However, the term covers a vital range of professionals that most of us have dealings with over the years.

The allied health professions cover a wide range of expertise. For example, they include art, drama and music therapists. Those therapies help mental and physical wellbeing. There are also the more well-known AHPs: physiotherapists, occupational therapists and speech therapists. The allied health professions also include therapeutic and diagnostic radiographers, podiatrists and paramedics. That list is not exhaustive. Their professionalism extends beyond medical interventions and often includes tender loving care, good words, kindness and listening to the anxieties of their patients.

AHPs are essential to the wellbeing of my constituents and, indeed, to my own wellbeing. I have had to use the professional services of a physio on more than one occasion and can tell members that I am thankful for that. Similarly, I saw a podiatrist who was taking referrals during Covid. I have decided since then to take much better care of my feet. They are more important to me than I ever knew.

The intervention of those health professionals cured me of pain and increased my mobility, as such intervention does for many others. That, of course, has a big impact on general health and mental wellbeing. Therefore, it also saves pressure on our general practitioners, the national health service and our hospitals. There is no doubt that, as the population ages—and I know what I am talking about—we will need more therapists, particularly physios.

I turn to the work of paramedics in our ambulance service. They provide specialist care and treatment to patients who have been involved in accidents, emergencies and other crises. They need to be able to make swift decisions, stay calm and calm their patients. They often arrive before a GP and ensure that patients are stabilised and en route to hospital without delay. I will give two examples.

A few years back, I was out with the Borders police on patrol in the wee small hours over Saturday night into Sunday morning. We received a call-out and blue-lighted to a Borders town where a poor woman had thrown herself from a bridge into the river below. The river was low, so she fell on to rocks. I watched the police, fire and rescue and paramedics in synchronised action without a word having to be exchanged. Each played their part in the rescue. The police had sealed off the road and fire and rescue had lowered equipment to river level to raise her up. Paramedics were already there. They had descended, wrapped the woman in foil and placed her on a stretcher.

The second event was when, in the course of my profession as a solicitor, I had the tragic case of a woman who tried to cross a railway line. She nearly managed to haul herself on to the platform, but fell back and was hit by a train, trapping her underneath. The driver was about to move the train, but was stopped by the paramedics, as the wheels were acting as a tourniquet on her legs, and moving the train would have made her bleed to death. The paramedics crawled underneath the train, covered in hot engine oil. They comforted her and took early medical interventions, which saved her life.

Not all call-outs are so awful, but many involve road traffic accidents. Like the other services in attendance that I have mentioned, the police and fire and rescue might need cutting equipment. They face sights that must and do impact on them.

In conclusion, I thank Carol Mochan for bringing forward this debate, and I thank all who work as allied health professionals. I hope that everyone who is listening to this now realises exactly what allied health professionals are.

Constituents have advised me that, post-Covid, in certain—only certain—GP practices, they are experiencing barriers to booking face-to-face appointments because the practices have changed their process so that there are online consultation forms, which are difficult for some constituents to use. Is the cabinet secretary aware of that, and will he comment on it?

Whether I am speaking to representatives of Lothian Buses, the main company that serves Midlothian in my constituency, or Borders Buses, which serves the Borders, the answer to the driver shortage question is the same: Brexit. Apart from such meetings, what else can be done, under devolved Government, to remedy the impact that such shortages are having on delivery of bus services in my rural constituency?

To ask the Scottish Government what it can do to address any bus driver shortages across Midlothian South, Tweeddale and Lauderdale. (S6O-01497)

Poverty has a huge impact on children’s ability to learn. Does the cabinet secretary agree that any child would find it difficult to learn on an empty stomach? Free school meals for children in primaries 1 to 5, the child payment of £25 per week for every child in a qualifying family and the extension of that to children up to 16, which will all be available from 14 November, will play an enormous part in improving the attainment of all our children in schools.

Will the member take an intervention?

The cabinet secretary knows that I support the bill in principle, but I have some concerns about people in the 16 to 18 age range, notwithstanding the issue of guidance, which I know has been discussed. I am also concerned about people in that age range being required to have lived in their acquired gender for only three months. Accordingly, I am on the cusp of considering amendments, but I would rather discuss the issues with the cabinet secretary first. I give her an assurance that I support the bill at stage 1, but will she meet me to discuss those issues?

Labour can respond when it winds up.

The Labour Party simply cannot come here and, in order to mitigate Tory policies, make uncosted demands and mislead the public as to what can and cannot be done by the devolved Government without it plundering the existing and allocated budgets for our public services.

As the minister has already said, this Government has taken unprecedented steps to help the most vulnerable people. Those measures include the rent freeze, the Scottish child payment, free school meals for all children in primaries 1 to 5, free bus travel for under-22s and over-60s, free prescriptions and free personal care.

I am reminded of the wonderful Mark Drakeford’s reply to the Tory leader in the Senedd, in response to his criticisms of the state of the Welsh NHS. Addressing Mr Davies, Mr Drakeford, trembling with anger, said:

“It is shocking. It is absolutely shocking to me that you think that you can turn up here this afternoon, with the mess that your party has made of the budgets of this country, of the reputation of this country around the world, and that you promise those people that there will be more to come ... And you think you can turn up here this afternoon and claim some sort of moral high ground. What sort of world do you belong in?”—[Record of Proceedings, Senedd Cymru/Welsh Parliament, 18 October 2022.]

I could not have said it better myself.

I say the same to the Scottish Labour Party: what sort of world does it live in? Stop demanding that the Scottish Government clean up a Tory mess. What is it thinking? Mitigating Tory polices might be good enough for Labour, but it is not good enough for me or for Scotland.

The Tory amendment tests the definition of “brass neck” by attempting to delete any reference to the economic vandalism of the Liz Truss mini-budget, which crashed the economy and led to the Bank of England having to buy Government bonds to prevent us from losing international borrowing that has been sustaining the UK economy for decades—all to prevent the economy from plummeting into a death spiral. Those are polices that the Tories here urged the Scottish Government to adopt.

As it is, the damage was done—interest rates zoomed to 10 per cent plus, and what was already a bad situation under the former Chancellor of the Exchequer, Rishi Sunak, got worse. He refused to restore the additional £20 per week to universal credit: by the way, 38,000 veterans and 3,000 people who serve in the forces are on universal credit. He failed to commit to the triple lock on pensions and failed to ensure that benefits will rise with inflation. Today at Prime Minister’s question time he refused again to do those things, although he claims that he will be compassionate. I am not holding my breath. I ask the Tories to write to the most recent Prime Minister to commit to the state pension triple lock, to upgrade benefits in line with inflation, to restore the £20 a week extra universal credit and, as a grand finale, to cap bankers bonuses. While they are cc-ing in the chancellor, I ask that they copy me in, too.

I turn to the Labour motion, which is, like the curate’s egg, good in parts. For example, it recognises the folly of and fall-out from Trussonomics. However, let us consider the calls in the motion for the Scottish Government to take further action. I asked Mark Griffin to provide costings for those actions, but he sidestepped my question.

The motion refers to many good things, including

“the cancellation of school meals debt”.

What funding would be required to action that? It also refers to

“increased funding for money advice services and a top up to the welfare fund”.

How much would those cost?

To those actions, we can add the legitimate calls for quite understandable wage increases across the public sector, including for staff in the health, police, justice and education sectors, to meet the 10 per cent plus inflation rate. Those calls are a result of the catastrophic rise in interest rates, fuel costs and food price inflation. Has that been costed?

Daniel Johnson rose—

Those are all worthy measures, but can Mark Griffin give us a costing for them and tell us where the funding will come from?