The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1459 contributions
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Angela Constance
No. It is important to note for the record that, in general, fines are not paid directly to victims. The fine income, in the first instance, rests with the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service as part of its income inflows throughout the year.
I will clarify with the committee what happens with compensation orders, which are a different form of financial penalty. However, any funds from restitution orders that are imposed by the courts go into the restitution fund—they do not go directly to victims. Organisations that support police, police staff and others can apply to the fund that is available, to enable them to support victims.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Angela Constance
The funds still rest in a ring-fenced account. There is data available: the courts have imposed 103 restitution orders. I will be frank, convener, and say that, although that is a matter for the independent courts, I have asked my officials to engage appropriately with the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service after the successful—I hope—passing of this statutory instrument. We will proceed with the establishment of the guidance and the application process and get the fund up and running for applications by April next year.
I am keen to make people aware of the benefits of restitution orders and to support their use in a way that is appropriate to my role and does not stretch into interfering with the independence of the courts in any way. However, I want to boost the funds that can go into the restitution fund so that they can be used appropriately.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Angela Constance
For the purposes of today, I have not looked in close detail at how compensation orders currently work. I know that, because fines are financial penalties, the income from those does not go to victims.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Angela Constance
As I said to Ms McNeill, the court has various options in front of it—a custodial sentence, a community payback order, a financial penalty by way of a fine, a compensation order or a restitution order. The court can apply one or all of those options, or a combination of them, as it sees fit.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Angela Constance
Victims, who could include police officers, would be entitled.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Angela Constance
It could be.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 4 June 2025
Angela Constance
I will clarify that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Angela Constance
I cannot comment on what evidence the committee has received. I can only tell you about the evidence that I have received from the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service and the Crown Office, through direct engagement with me and my officials. I have not had any red flags raised with me, and I am confident that the Crown Office and the Scottish Courts and Tribunals Service would not be shy about doing that.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Angela Constance
The short answer is yes.
Criminal Justice Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 30 April 2025
Angela Constance
The majority of the coronavirus time limits have been expired, and we are now left with the two solemn time limits. The SSI that is in front of us today deals with the remaining two of the original seven time limits, so that journey has already commenced. I am acutely conscious that, every time that I have come to the committee to seek an extension to the coronavirus regulations, the area on which the committee has pressed me most is the remaining time limits. Of course, we have all known that the coronavirus legislation would come to an end.
The progress that has been made with the court backlog in the number of scheduled cases has reached a milestone in that fewer than 20,000 such cases remain. The committee will remember that, at its peak, the number of outstanding scheduled cases was in excess of 40,000, so the court backlog has been reduced by more than 50 per cent. Progress has been made and stakeholders—both the SCTS and the Crown Office, with which we have had extensive engagement—are content that the system will manage with that approach.