The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 350 contributions
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Roz McCall
Okay. I accept that. I do not think that I have time to ask anyone else to comment.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Roz McCall
Good morning. Thank you very much for coming and answering our questions. I will follow on from the two themes that we have just spoken about. We have looked at multiyear funding and flexible funding, and we have been asked to look at an inflationary bump in funding. Multiyear and flexible funding would both have to start from an accepted understanding that there will be fixed costs, and, for multiyear funding, those fixed costs would be fixed at the beginning, and so on.
I want to get some input from both of you. How can we do that? How can we give an inflationary bump to the multiyear and flexible models? There will be unforeseen costs, but, equally, there has to be a starting point, which comes from fixed costs.
I will start with you, Ran, to move it around. How can we change the models to do that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Roz McCall
I totally get that. It was a horrible question, so I apologise.
Ran, I will ask briefly for your opinion on the same question. It is a horrible one, I know, but what if we cannot do all three?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Roz McCall
Good morning, everyone. I want to pinpoint the inflation uplift point. I will come to you first, Rachel, as you mentioned it. We have talked about multiyear funding and flexible funding. We will always rub up against a dichotomy with the fact that there will be fixed costs that have to be taken into consideration. That is a standard point. If we put that into multiyear funding, the inflationary uplift becomes part of an issue. Will you give me a little more information on what you mean by inflationary uplifts? How will they happen? How can we do it? I know that that is a big question.
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Roz McCall
I totally accept that, and I understand the position that you are in. I am sorry to force the issue, but what I am trying to get at is that we need to know what you advise on how we can do this. I know that that is a big question. It is not just a matter of doing a simple sum and giving inflationary rises. Given that there are fixed costs, we have to assume that, with multilevel funding, they will be fixed for the term, whether that is three, five or 10 years. Are you talking about an inflationary rise on everything? What are you asking for?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee
Meeting date: 12 September 2024
Roz McCall
Lynn, you come from a different area. What is your opinion on that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Roz McCall
I appreciate that, minister. That brings us back to the question about what training and resources will be provided. The point about using best practice was well made earlier, but, equally, we are looking for people to ask and act, and the act part focuses on two or three specific and key bottleneck points. It will always come down to people at those points doing the work to make sure that we reduce homelessness. We are always going to have that bottleneck, are we not? How are we going to stop that?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Roz McCall
Mr Bruce, we have heard a lot of information and I accept that there is a lot of overlap. Again, I have a specific question. Would shifting the timeframe to early in the financial year make a difference, or does any multiyear process need to be looked at again, right from the start?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Roz McCall
That makes a lot of sense. Does anybody else want to pop back in on any of the additional points, before I finish up?
Social Justice and Social Security Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 5 September 2024
Roz McCall
Good morning. It will come as no surprise that I feel strongly about rural issues. We took evidence from the Association of Local Authority Chief Housing Officers, which said that solutions need to be specifically suited to a rural context. Homeless Network Scotland stated that the bill probably does not go far enough on specific geographies and circumstances in rural areas. All In For Change said that there are issues with travel costs and public transport in rural areas, and the committee was also told that no consideration has been given to how the processes could cut people off from support networks and their work.
That is quite a lot of information. What have you taken on board from that extra information to ensure that rural areas will have the equality of service that they require?