The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 378 contributions
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
Section 6 of the bill creates a new requirement that notice of the appointment of a judicial factor must be registered in an existing public register called the register of inhibitions. Is that a good policy approach or can any of the panel see difficulties with it? Are there any viable alternative approaches? Also, is it your understanding of the bill that an inhibition is created via registration in the context of section 6?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
Sorry, did you just say that it was never paid?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
One policy argument supporting the change of approach to caution in section 5 of the bill is that, when a professional is appointed to the role, professional indemnity insurance provides a suitable alternative to obtaining a specialist bond of caution. Do any of the witnesses want to comment on whether the scope of their professional indemnity cover protects those with an interest in the estate to the same extent as a bond of caution does?
Delegated Powers and Law Reform Committee
Meeting date: 23 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
Good morning, panel. In response to the committee’s call for views, the centre for Scots law at the University of Aberdeen and R3 said that they thought the threshold for requiring caution, in section 5, is set too high. Does the centre for Scots law want to explain its reasoning, or does anyone else on the panel wish to comment on the policy merits of the proposed threshold?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
I asked the current Deputy First Minister whether she would change the regulation. What is her current position on that? I do not think that we have had a clear answer.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
The last time the committee considered the petition, the petitioner mentioned that he goes to schools to teach children about gamekeepers and the pupils do not know what a gamekeeper is. I do not know whether he has done anything about that, but he mentioned that that needs to be taught in schools and that a lot of people are not aware of that. Is there any improvement on that?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
I suggest that we write to the Scottish Government to ask when its latest review of information sources and decisions relating to the pause in or withdrawal of Covid-19 guidance took place, and what the outcome of that review was.
We could also write to stakeholders to seek their views on the action called for in the petition. Those stakeholders could include the Royal College of Nursing, Scottish Care and the Health and Social Care Alliance Scotland. We could also write to the Care Inspectorate to ask how “adequate and suitable” ventilation is defined in practice and how it assesses and enforces the ventilation standards.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
Is it possible for non-governmental legal intervention to tackle SLAPPs?
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
Non-governmental—so, as in the example just given.
Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee
Meeting date: 17 April 2024
Foysol Choudhury
That is correct, yes.