The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 902 contributions
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Lorna Slater
I have questions about the futureproofing of the legislation and your comfort with where it currently sits. First, the bill’s definition of a digital asset requires an immutable record from the electronic system involved. Could that limit the adoption of future technology if it does not operate as blockchain does currently?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Lorna Slater
My final question is slightly more general. I think that you have covered this, but I am going to get you to say it explicitly for the record. Do you think that the requirement for a potential property item to exist separately from the legal system is clear enough in the bill, given the on-going debate about the extent to which that is possible for digital assets?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Lorna Slater
It is a record.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Lorna Slater
Thank you. That is very clear.
Turning to things that will be recognised as digital assets under the bill, tokenisation is an emerging use of digital technology but is not dealt with directly by the bill. Can you share your views on the concept of tokenisation and whether certain types of tokenised assets are likely to be recognised as digital assets under the bill?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Lorna Slater
Good answer.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 November 2025
Lorna Slater
If current systems were to develop to allow changes in limited circumstances—for example, in cases of fraud—is it fair to deny any potential property items arising from those systems recognition under the bill?
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Lorna Slater
The issue is about humans releasing and relocating animals. You need to have a licence to release a beaver, relocate a red squirrel or release a lynx or another new animal into the environment. You should need a licence to release pheasants into the environment. That is all—a licence.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Lorna Slater
I would like to hear from the cabinet secretary on that point. I am unclear why the exemption was granted in 2011. It was certainly not granted on environmental grounds, but the gamekeeping lobby won that exemption. I would like to hear from the cabinet secretary what the Scottish Government’s intentions are on pheasants.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Lorna Slater
I do not intend to move amendment 40, in favour of Mercedes Villalba’s amendment 12.
It is significant that members from three Opposition parties have lodged amendments concerning the release of pheasants. The RSPB estimates that 31.5 million pheasants are released in the UK annually. Pheasants are tropical birds but, because of explicit exemptions in the Wildlife and Natural Environment (Scotland) Act 2011, no licence is needed by anyone, anywhere, to release any number of pheasants into Scotland without any concern for the spread of disease such as avian flu, impacts on native species or the wellbeing of the birds.
Rural Affairs and Islands Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 November 2025
Lorna Slater
That is great—I am glad that we are reducing the potential impacts of pheasants. However, that is still not an argument against licensing. Why treat that one tropical bird species differently from every other animal species on planet earth that might be released into Scotland? We should know how many pheasants there are, who is releasing them and where, and we should know the impact that they are having on our environment. We do not know those things.