The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 867 contributions
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Lorna Slater
I have two more questions and will try to be quick.
Although the committee has not made any decisions yet, we may make recommendations that require primary legislation, such as a consolidation bill that would give the ombudsman the investigatory powers that it has been asking for and that would empower the Scottish Human Rights Commission, in a way that it is not currently empowered, to cover some advocacy issues. A bill might also consolidate the functions of some existing SPCB-supported bodies with those of some proposed ones. What is the Scottish Government’s appetite for that sort of primary legislation?
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Lorna Slater
If we seem to be doing all right for time, convener.
SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Lorna Slater
I will dig a bit further into the minister’s comment about a commissioner being one voice among many. I am interested in how we can have effective advocacy, and whether that could happen by expanding the role of the Scottish Human Rights Commission to take on advocacy, so that we do not need a separate victims commissioner, a children’s commissioner, an older people’s commissioner and so on.
Another proposal that has come across our desks is having ministerial portfolios for each of those areas. There would be roles such as a minister for older people, a minister for disabled people and so on. I am curious about your thoughts on that proposal. There are two aspects to my question. First, do you think that that would make for an effective way of advocating, which would also allow the entire Parliament to hold the responsible person to account?
Secondly, one of the criticisms that has been levelled at us throughout the evidence is that, when the Scottish Government creates a new commissioner, it is dodging responsibility, because the Government is then able to say, “The commissioner is doing that—it is not us.” Would having ministers for X, who would be responsible for advocacy under that portfolio, bring that responsibility back on board and solve that problem? Are there any disadvantages to that?
10:30SPCB Supported Bodies Landscape Review Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Lorna Slater
How would you respond to the accusation that, by creating a commission, the Government is dodging responsibility, because the commission, rather than the ministers, is now to be accountable?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Lorna Slater
We have heard that—we heard last week that 34 per cent of university graduates do not use their degrees. Does it represent a national waste of resources if we are using educational resources to train people?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Lorna Slater
And you do not perceive any particular barriers there.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Lorna Slater
It feels to me that there is a strong move towards workplace learning and that that is the case for every type of learning, whether it is academic or vocational learning.
I am an electromechanical engineer and I did a workplace learning scheme in North America—that is common over there, and it is starting to be more common in Scotland, with the graduate apprentices. I am interested in what you say about doing an industry placement week by week versus doing it in chunks of time, which is how we did it at my university.
Am I right about that—is workplace learning the way of the future? What barriers are there to that model? Do parents accept it? Is it the way forward for all types of learning?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Lorna Slater
Do you have any comments on colleges and flexibility, Peter?
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Lorna Slater
It is, as opposed to those who are just coming out of school.
Economy and Fair Work Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 7 May 2025
Lorna Slater
Do any of the other witnesses have views?