The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2800 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
That is helpful. We heard your examples about people in other parts of the country. How do visits from committees and off-site evidence taking impact the culture of committees and the relationships between committees, Parliament and the public?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
That is interesting, because we have not picked up on that in the gender audit work.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
The public get fatigued by all the consultations that go on at different levels.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
We have touched on doing that with our people’s panel on drug-related deaths, which I attended.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
That is interesting. My next question is on that theme, but it is about engaging not with ministers in that manner but with external stakeholders. How can we be much more effective in leveraging our relationships with external stakeholders to drive more effective scrutiny and support the work of committees? External stakeholders who give evidence, such as you, make committees more effective and provide a supporting role. Do you have any thoughts on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
It is not our fault, as a committee.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
It is a little bit of both, then.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
That is helpful. Professor Norton, please answer briefly.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
I enjoyed hearing that. It was quite helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Sue Webber
That is helpful. Earlier, the committee heard—I think from you, Dr Fox—about an internal document and you said that committees need to “prioritise ruthlessly in order to be effective”.
There is also the question of balance with regard to being led by officials. Speaking as an ex-convener for the Education, Children and Young People Committee, I can say that we were very much led by the legislative agenda, and you can see some of the pressures that the committee is facing in the coming weeks in relation to the Education (Scotland) Bill. The committee is now having to meet on Wednesday evenings and all sorts of things.
Dr Fox, as you mentioned the internal document that might help with prioritisation, are there any other tools and approaches that committees could adopt to help to balance the legislative work and the proactive inquiry work, which is probably of more interest to people outside the Parliament?