The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2725 contributions
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sue Webber
I have a number of questions, if that is okay. First, I know that Jackson Cullinane spoke at length about the municipally owned Lothian Buses, but I remind everyone that it is, thankfully, not run by any politicians but by bus experts. The dividend does not always go back to local authorities; Lothian Buses decides the dividend. At the moment, a lot of the dividend is being used to finance the trams.
I want to ask about train passenger numbers, which is key to driving revenue, and I know that your views on profit are perhaps a bit different from mine. To increase passenger numbers, you probably need more stations. I notice that the number of stations that are managed in Scotland has been quite static. I wonder whether I can unashamedly make a pitch about building a nice new station in Winchburgh. How might that change passenger behaviour and drive people from cars on to trains?
Net Zero, Energy and Transport Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 April 2025
Sue Webber
It does not. This morning, we heard about the reliability and punctuality of buses being a key issue when it comes to getting people to use them. The report on bus patronage trends notes that road works are among the most significant contributors to bus delays. Is there anything that we can do that might help to reduce the delays and lack of punctuality that is caused by road works across the various bus networks?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Sue Webber
We are on three committees sometimes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Sue Webber
No, carry on—it is fine.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Sue Webber
My next question is about the balance between having career conveners and the opportunity for a convenership to be a career stepping stone. In some of the churn that we have referred to, when conveners from the governing party are moved into ministerial roles, one might perhaps challenge that they have been rewarded with that ministerial role because they have defended the position of Government very well in their role as convener. How does that connect with the esteem associated with holding the role of convener? I am interested in your thoughts on that.
Maybe Tom Caygill can answer that question first, and then Ken Hughes can come in.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Sue Webber
I hear you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Sue Webber
That is fine.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Sue Webber
My viewpoint is based on my experience when I was the convener of the Education, Children and Young People Committee. With regard to creating a connection with what is going on outside, the committee did an inquiry into additional support for learning—we took a lot of evidence and produced a really good report. The Government delayed its update on its action plan on additional support for learning until after our report was published, so there seemed to be a little bit of joined-up thinking. With regard to committees’ recommendations, there is always a mismatch between what the Government perceives is going on and the reality on the ground. Some of Audit Scotland’s discussions have been quite useful in relation to making the effectiveness or acceptance of committee recommendations more trackable. Do you have any thoughts about how the quality of committees’ recommendations could be adapted or reviewed to allow that to happen?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Sue Webber
That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Sue Webber
My question leads on from what we have just spoken about in relation to the culture in the Scottish Parliament and how that has perhaps shaped our convener role a bit differently from how the role is shaped in other legislatures. What are the strengths and weaknesses of the Scottish Parliament’s conveners?