The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2847 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Roseanne McDonald said that you are seeking to assess whether the clinician who will carry out the procedures in the Spire hospital in Bristol has an affiliation with an NHS trust in England. Is that because they work only privately at the moment?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
I have two questions: one about the reimbursement process and one on service commissioning for the future. We will deal with the reimbursement element first. Mr Hornby has spoken about it being a case-by-case process. We have heard from many of the witnesses about how complicated the issue of what we call wraparound costs is—we already know that the surgery is complicated, that no two cases are the same and that unexpected costs occur.
The administration of the reimbursement scheme sounds like it might be quite complex. At the same time, the payment will not be made until everything is concluded, but women will want to be reimbursed as quickly as possible. What extra resources has NSS put in to administer the scheme successfully to tie it all in for the women at the end of a traumatic period of their lives?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
NHS National Services Scotland has expressed concern that the bill might set a precedent for other groups in a similar position. What have you and your team learned from the experience to ensure that we will not have to consider similar provision for other procedures in the future?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
I have a quick question for Dr Jamieson. What is the time period between the first and second consultations? That will have a big impact when you are planning your service.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you for coming along, cabinet secretary. You mentioned the cross-party support for the bill, but given that the NHS has always had the ability to refer patients for services between Scotland and England, can you see any reasons why you might not need to establish the reimbursement scheme?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Our papers say that, when we called for views on the bill from the health boards, we received responses only from NHS Highland and NHS Greater Glasgow and Clyde. That is an indicator that the health boards are perhaps not aware of what is going on despite the publicity that the matter has had. What work is under way to publicise the service to the various NHS boards throughout Scotland? What is the timeline for them to receive guidance on the referral routes to make the process as clear as possible for women who will access the service via their local health boards?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
From what we heard this morning before the meeting, the biggest issue appears to be women having the money up front to fund the surgery; the bill is about reimbursement. We also heard that there could be significant on-going costs that are not planned for regarding surgery for removal of mesh and complications—particularly when women access surgery through the private sector. Is there something that we can do to help with that? It will not be a very equal service if there are women who do not have the resources to pay up front then claim it back and therefore cannot access what the bill is, ultimately, trying to achieve.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
In one of your earlier statements, Terry, you spoke of new staff coming on board. Where are they being recruited from? What multidisciplinary areas of expertise do they cover that the team did not cover previously?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
Is that the realistic medicine that you referred to earlier in the discussion today?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you for clarifying that—it was very helpful. What is the position for women who have had mesh removal surgery that has not gone as they expected? When surgery has not been as successful as it was hoped it would be and there are on-going issues, how will that be covered or addressed by the bill?