The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2725 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you for those answers. However, going back to what Jackie Baillie said earlier on and the correspondence that we received last night, that trust and confidence are still not there. That binary choice, and the one route into referral via Glasgow, will be an issue.
Although the choice of surgeon is significant, another factor is that, for whatever reason, the Glasgow service has a bad reputation among mesh survivors. What, specifically, are we doing to give women the confidence to come into the service, knowing that they will get a good outcome, wherever it might be, for whatever treatment and whatever the approach might be needed at the other end?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you; that answers my specific question.
Can you clarify whether all women will still have to refer in via NHS GGC, whether the commissioned service be the Glasgow mesh service, the site in NHS England, the potential site at Spire Healthcare, or overseas? With regard to the hierarchy—that word might not be correct but you will understand it—is there a preferred route? If the women do not want to go to Glasgow, will we encourage them to take up the service in NHS England because it is an NHS service and the wraparound care might be more definable there, or are those choices patient driven? The matter is complicated.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
You have spoken at length, and we have heard much, about the complexity of the wraparound care that the women need. Are you satisfied that the bill and the provision for procurement of services from the private sector will not undermine the NHS in any way?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 2 November 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you for that answer. We know that the first point of call is often with the woman and her GP, but there are many GPs across the country. What wider publicity and training are being provided about the national mesh service, and particularly about the GPs linking into it and understanding the complications that arise from the surgery, so that they can refer women quickly and effectively into the service?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
Is that the realistic medicine that you referred to earlier in the discussion today?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
Thank you for clarifying that—it was very helpful. What is the position for women who have had mesh removal surgery that has not gone as they expected? When surgery has not been as successful as it was hoped it would be and there are on-going issues, how will that be covered or addressed by the bill?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
My question is also for Terry O’Kelly. We have heard a lot from witnesses about the logistical challenges in managing the private sector experience in the US and England, and the challenges facing the NHS service in gaining trust. Obviously, an NHS-based service will be much better at managing the anticipated and unplanned outcomes of the complex surgery. What is being done to benchmark and reassure people that in Scotland we will have among the best mesh removal specialist services?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
From what we heard this morning before the meeting, the biggest issue appears to be women having the money up front to fund the surgery; the bill is about reimbursement. We also heard that there could be significant on-going costs that are not planned for regarding surgery for removal of mesh and complications—particularly when women access surgery through the private sector. Is there something that we can do to help with that? It will not be a very equal service if there are women who do not have the resources to pay up front then claim it back and therefore cannot access what the bill is, ultimately, trying to achieve.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 26 October 2021
Sue Webber
In one of your earlier statements, Terry, you spoke of new staff coming on board. Where are they being recruited from? What multidisciplinary areas of expertise do they cover that the team did not cover previously?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 5 October 2021
Sue Webber
Welcome, cabinet secretary. My question is about online advertising. You mentioned the reasons why you want to take that approach, but have you had any thoughts about what you might like to do that would be different from the approaches of the other UK nations?