The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2725 contributions
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 21 December 2021
Sue Webber
It is nice to see you today, Dr Phin. I have certainly had a lot of correspondence in my inbox about the secondary breast cancer audit, which Scottish patients are not contributing to, so I found that last question from my colleague pertinent.
I would like to ask about the key lessons that the four nations have learned from the pandemic. What policy divergence has there been, what has changed from what was done in the past and are the key lessons reflected in the framework? I am thinking in the context of the research that the Scottish Election Study published last week, which said that there was a poor understanding of the Scottish Government’s FACTS messaging compared with the “Hands, face, space” messaging that came from Public Health England. Given what we have heard about collaboration and consensus, do you think that we might be a bit more aligned in the future?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Sue Webber
That is great—thanks.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Sue Webber
Cat Berry, who was one of the witnesses at last week’s meeting, suggested that the timescales for implementation of the specialist baby loss units can and should be shortened. Do you think that that is possible, Ms Todd?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Sue Webber
Is the sound better now?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Sue Webber
I suppose that the witnesses—[Inaudible.]—very upsetting—[Inaudible.]—many of us. We heard of quite varying—[Inaudible.]—in terms of how the services are set up for people who, I am sad to say, know that they are going to give birth to a stillborn baby, and for the important moment when they have to have that conversation with healthcare professionals. What improvements are being made to ensure that parents are consistently treated with compassion across the country and in every health board, and that they are not being retraumatised when they access services later on? They are a very vulnerable group of people, so I would like to know what we are doing to drill down into those issues and to help them consistently, irrespective of where they live.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Sue Webber
You spoke a lot about women there, but there are also fathers to consider. Another message that has come out in the evidence is that it should be ensured that fathers are included.
All sorts of trauma can happen during pregnancy that can make women reticent on subsequent visits to the unit. Such trauma does not always result in the sad loss of a baby. What are we doing to ensure that the mental health of women who have experienced significant trauma is taken into account in the perinatal period?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 14 December 2021
Sue Webber
According to information that we have, NHS Lothian has said that the Government needs
“to further invest beyond the recommendations”.
We have heard a lot about the training, staffing and so on. I seek reassurance that there will be the continuous reassessment of the workforce and the investment that are needed. NHS Lothian talks candidly about the
“need to consider an increased staffing complement to ensure that education and training, clinical supervision and support are embedded as part of practice and held in the same parity as direct clinical care.”
That is about making sure that time for self-development and improvement is included in people’s working time.
I think that Mr Stewart is probably best suited to comment on that, but I am not sure.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 2 December 2021
Sue Webber
Like Ms Whitham, I am a sitting councillor, but with City of Edinburgh Council. That is recorded in my entry in the register of members’ interests.
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Sue Webber
My question follows on quite nicely, I think. It is about eco-ableism, and is mainly directed to Gavin Macleod. We have heard about a number of environmental policies on active travel and redesigning streets, which might make it more difficult and challenging for those with a disability to access them. What are your thoughts on that? Do you feel included in those discussions?
Health, Social Care and Sport Committee
Meeting date: 30 November 2021
Sue Webber
This question, which regards the disability element, is directed to Gavin Macleod, whose report and presentation spoke quite acutely of how disabled people have been impacted to a greater extent than other groups. What one thing could we do to rectify the situation with regard to that group more quickly than with regard to the less disadvantaged groups? How can we support the reluctant returners to sport?