The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1790 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
In the chamber during a plenary session.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
This is the final oral session, so, if you have thoughts after the session on what has been asked, please reach out to the committee. Do you want to say anything, Graham?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Absolutely. I have a couple of questions with regard to the custodial sentence aspect. At the minute, as you rightly set out, the rules specify a sentence of more than 12 months and the bill looks at reducing that to six months. I go back to the word “objective”, which is the word that I have probably used the most today. Is the objective test the fact that the custodial sentence is six months, or is it about the type of case that has occasioned that six-month sentence?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
It is fundamentally about trying to guide MSPs to behave properly. I am trying to see where we land between that and representation of the electorate. There are people who will say that their representative is not representing them. It might be a substantial number of people. It might, in fact, be a majority of people in the constituency or region who are saying that. Could just being so annoyed at a representative that you want rid of them be a ground for doing so?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Finally, in relation to the custodial provisions, someone being on remand would not trigger the process.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
There is no suggestion whatsoever that Jamie Greene would be recalled.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
You are trying to find that balance between the privacy that MSPs are entitled to, because it is a very public job at the best of times, and the potential requirement when there is not a satisfactory explanation and there is a failure on behalf of the voters who sent an MSP here to perform their job.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, it is about the act of incarceration?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
But in a suspended sentence, there would not be an incarceration, therefore it would not trigger—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is probably exactly where we are going with the questions.