The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1432 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Martin Whitfield
I welcome Andy O’Neill, Phil Thompson and Louise Edwards from the Electoral Commission Scotland, along with Malcolm Burr and Chris Highcock from the Electoral Management Board for Scotland. Thank you for coming along this morning, whether you are appearing in person or online.
We have quite a tight timescale today, so, when we come to committee members’ questions, we expect answers not from everybody but perhaps just from those who are best able to contribute evidence. Before we start the questioning, I invite Andy O’Neill and Malcolm Burr to give short opening statements.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Martin Whitfield
Two thirds of voters had the view—“criticism” is too strong a word—that the voting process took longer. We heard about the measures that were put in place such as one-way systems, meet-and-greets and single-use pencils. What other options to make polling stations safe were considered but then discounted?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Martin Whitfield
Were any ideas considered but then discounted? I know that there was the ability to hold the election over a few days, which you have explained, but was there anything else?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Martin Whitfield
I welcome Louise Edwards.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Martin Whitfield
Would Louise Edwards like to take that question on time limits?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Martin Whitfield
Malcolm, I do not know whether you heard the question, but there are a number of surprised faces around the table.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Martin Whitfield
Has any thought been given to retaining any of the additional elements that were put in place? For example, a number of people told me that they were thankful for the meet-and-greet element, because it made them feel easier about going in.
09:45Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 23 September 2021
Martin Whitfield
Once the witnesses have had time to consider that, it might be useful for them to write to the committee. As Bob Doris said, if there are gaps in the information, it would be useful to know that.
The turnout for the election was the highest of any Scottish Parliament election to date. Why was there that increase?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Martin Whitfield
I am slightly conscious of the time, so I will jump to Alexander Stewart.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 9 September 2021
Martin Whitfield
Absolutely. I have spoken to the clerk about my role as the convener, and I have indicated to a number of CPGs that I will not take part in them simply because of that role. That is not a requirement; it is just something that I feel would be beneficial, so that CPGs understand that there is an even-handedness.
Attendance at, and membership of, a CPG by any member of this committee is perfectly fine. I think that it is good practice to point out—exactly as you have, Paul—when you have a specific interest in something that is before us, but that certainly does not preclude your involvement in the discussion.