The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1988 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I have received apologies from Annie Wells, who will not be joining us this morning. I apologise to her and to those watching for not saying that at the outset.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, this is the right time for the change and there is an imperative that it happens in this parliamentary session rather than waiting—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Before I turn to Chris Milne, I have a question about the period in which a prosecution must take place. There is a proposal for that to be three years, with that period running from start of the criminal investigation rather than from the date of the offence. What is the Law Society’s view on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
We should always ask the experts.
Chris, what is your view of that potential criminal offence?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
The Law Society’s written evidence raised the issue of parliamentary time for scrutiny. Fiona Stuart, what are your comments on that, given where we are in the session?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Just for the public record, which areas do we need to scrutinise more today?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
In essence, there is an exchange of data, which makes it sensible to do it that way. That is not dissimilar to the proposal in the bill. That is helpful.
Fiona Stuart, you have provided us with an excellent contents page for what we will cover today. I will move to the aspect of offences. There is a proposal to create an offence of altering records with the specific intent of preventing disclosure. What are the challenges in that regard?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I have a question for Gordon Martin. Dr Meechan said that, in his experience, there has been a reduction in the reliance on commercial sensitivity reasons to block freedom of information requests. Is that your experience, too? Have you seen a decline in refusals of your requests on the ground of commercial sensitivity, or is your experience different?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 13 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Does the cost of all that outweigh the value of having primary legislation that says that it would be an offence for someone to deliberately destroy or remove from access something that they knew to be worrying? Can we live with failing to put that up as a principle that all public servants—and professionals—should deal with?