The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2050 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Unless anyone wants to comment on that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Please do.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
And all of those things have protections already.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I want to explore how you envisage the role of Parliament. The current consultation period covers two sessions and two iterations of Parliament. There is a view of what the role of Parliament is. What is the philosophical reason for giving Parliament the power to designate when almost everything else sits with Government and is then scrutinised by Parliament? What are the advantages? What are the timescales? What is the problem that we are trying to address? Is it just that it is taking too long to expand designation?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
We have heard concerns about the timings that are proposed in the bill and whether the years are triggered from time of the event or the investigation. Even the most innocent of people might think that it is a challenge to have a timescale that does not start when an event happened but starts when another event happens at some future date. What is your view on that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, the public can be confident that not starting the time until some future date is because the level that is needed to prove a potential offence is so high that it will be used only when something has been put beyond the reach of the public deliberately, with the intent of preventing the public from seeing it. The public can take confidence in having a more elongated timescale, if I can put it that way.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Good. My final question is about the 12 months until royal assent, should the bill be passed. Do you have any views about the code of practice on proactive publication in that time?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, the Scottish Government’s concern is not that the Parliament is an unusual vehicle but that the Scottish Government’s wider interest in FOI—you have talked about cross-policy input—is so great that designation should not sit with the Parliament. Should the process stay in place, so that the Parliament is involved only in iterations of updating?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Sue, can I bring you in?