The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1475 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is interesting, because my next question is on the committee’s statement of purpose, which exists at Westminster but is probably even more developed in the Senedd. What is that statement’s role, and is it Parliament wide? Should we perhaps consider committee-level statements of purpose in the Scottish Parliament?
I ask Diana Stirbu to answer first. I know that a lot of work is being done on that in the Senedd. Do you have a view? How do you develop such a statement?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
I think that Diana Stirbu wants to comment, too.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
I certainly do not think that that sounds creepy. I think that every committee member is glad to have that support.
I thank the witnesses for what has been a fascinating and, at times, in-depth discussion. If you have any subsequent thoughts, please reach out to the clerks as our inquiry goes on. Thank you for your contributions and evidence.
10:56 Meeting continued in private until 11:19.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
As convener, I am gently going to move us along, because I am conscious of the time. I will bring in Sue Webber, as her questions build on what we have just been talking about.
10:15Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
Are there any other comments before I gently move us on?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
On that point, I will pass over to Emma Roddick, who has questions on structure and culture in committees.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
Diane Stirbu, do you want to come in?
09:30Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
The best-laid plans can go awry, depending on who is on the committee.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
Our third agenda item is the third in a series of four oral evidence sessions in our committee effectiveness inquiry. The inquiry is seeking to answer the question of whether changes to the Parliament’s procedures and practices would help committees to work more effectively. Our call for written views on the inquiry has now closed, and the submissions will be published on our website in due course. Today, we are seeking to explore committee effectiveness in the context of changes to the committee system in other legislatures and how those have been measured and evaluated.
I welcome Professor Diana Stirbu, co-director of the centre for applied research in empowering society at London Metropolitan University, who joins us online; Professor Philip Lord Norton of Louth, professor of government and director of the centre for legislative studies at the University of Hull; Dr Stephen Holden Bates, senior lecturer in political science at the University of Birmingham; and Dr Ruth Fox, director and head of research at the Hansard Society.
This is a round-table evidence session. Although there will be the usual approach of questions from members to witnesses, it is intended that there will be opportunity for discussion between the witnesses on points in order to encourage a more open and free dialogue. There is no expectation that witnesses will answer all questions. Should anyone wish to come in on a question or in response to a point made by another witness, please indicate by catching my eye or that of the clerks. For Professor Stirbu, who is appearing remotely, I ask you to type the letter R in the chat box or pop your hand up, and I will notice and be most grateful.
As tends to be the case, you will be thrown on the mercy of the convener for the first set of questions. I want to look at the definition or meaning of “effectiveness of committees”. Is effectiveness context specific? If so, what are the factors that shape whether committees are effective in the places where the witnesses have worked and that they have observed? What is effectiveness in the context of committees?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 24 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the sixth meeting in 2025 of the Standards, Procedure and Public Appointments Committee. I have received apologies from Ruth Maguire, and I welcome Rona Mackay as her substitute.
Our first agenda item is a declaration of interests from a new member. I welcome to the committee Emma Roddick MSP and invite her to declare any interests that are relevant to her role on the committee.