The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2357 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
Yes, it does, and it prompts another question. In fulfilling that role, does a rapporteur square the circle of the tension that you talked about, Ken, in that a committee that is scrutinising a bill cannot be seen to have assisted in drafting it? I am putting committee bills aside for the moment. Would that help to keep the dynamic workable and justifiable to the Scottish public?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
Would that be more limited than only pre-legislative scrutiny? Or, as Cristina Leston-Bandeira pointed out, could it be used elsewhere, provided that the committee is separated from the reporter, who is always identified as such and takes a different stance in decision making?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you very much.
The other thing that I want to touch on—I will raise the issue and then pass over to Sue Webber—is how we define the remits of committees and whether doing so helps and assists. Not to curtail answers in the next bit, but Joe FitzPatrick has rightly mentioned the wonderment of the Lobbying (Scotland) Bill in its pre-legislative form. We will look next at post-legislative scrutiny and the Lobbying (Scotland) Bill is perhaps an example of when that should have happened but has not.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
Good morning, and welcome to the fifth meeting in 2025 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. I have received apologies from Ruth Maguire. I welcome Rona Mackay as her substitute. I understand that Annie Wells is running slightly late. We will see whether she makes it. If not, she extends her apologies as well.
Before we turn to our main agenda item, I note for the Official Report that, further to our meeting on 20 February, the committee has agreed to re-accord recognition to the cross-party group on Taiwan following further examination of records regarding the group’s compliance with the code of conduct.
Our first item is a decision on whether to take in private item 3, which is a discussion on the evidence that—I hope—we are about to hear. Does the committee agree to do so?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
If such work was done earlier in whatever process we are talking about, from that early sharing of postbags to the role of petitions, we would have the advantage of being able to say, “This Parliament is prioritising you, the public, and your issues.” However, that interesting idea of a committee reaching out much earlier to ask what the public would like us to do would be helpful for doing that, too. Would that be a fair conclusion to draw? I hope so—no pressure.
09:30Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 3 April 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. There have been a number of questions and discussions about the balance between the expertise of MSPs and the specialism that sits around them. As Tom Caygill pointed out, there is a value in the institutional memory that MSPs sometimes have of the journey that a piece of legislation has taken. However, as Cristina Leston-Bandeira pointed out, there are experts from the public who can, all the way through, offset the need for specialism. As Ken Hughes said, perhaps we want specialists not to make the decisions but to give the evidence.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Your two insights and all the insights from the witnesses today have been very valuable and incredibly interesting.
I thank you all for your time this morning. If there are any other thoughts, particularly from Meg Russell, whom I dropped in at the deep end with that last question, or if there is anything that you would like to add, “just phone the clerk”—to use Brian Taylor’s phrase—as a way in. Thank you very much.
10:42 Meeting continued in private until 11:14.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Are we seeking free media training at this point?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
Sir David, do you have a comment, before I hand back to Rona?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 20 March 2025
Martin Whitfield
We are ahead of the game on that—well, at the front of it. Joe, did you want to come in?