The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1808 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
You are monitoring the response rate, which is what the target is for, and SEPA’s rate is above that. You have talked about the access to information regime. Are you satisfied that that is as far along the pathway as it should be?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
In relation to intervention activity, the report outlines concerns that your ability to intervene has been restricted because of resources and so on. Can you give the committee a short explanation of how those concerns came about? It is probably more important to emphasise that you want your intervention capacity to be back to where you would hope it to be.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
My point is that a level 4 intervention is highly unusual. Do local authorities realise the significance and importance of a level 4 intervention? Following your generic experience of level 4 interventions, are you able to say to local authorities, “Watch out, but we are here to support you, not to punish you”?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
My final question on the issue is aimed at David Hamilton. In a sense, the approach to initiating new interventions has changed substantially in the past 16 weeks. I want to give you the opportunity to discuss the concept of being proactive about information becoming available, rather than reactive, following a request that is put in, usually from a member of the public. Is there a change in approach or is it just a response to circumstances that you have become aware of?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
Brilliant. Thank you very much.
I will turn to Stephen Kerr or Annie Wells.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
I am not sure that the position on pregnancy is for or against. [Laughter.]
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
I think that it relates to what your submission says with regard to the Government’s proposals on the organisations that FOI should apply to. In your response, I think that you said it was probably best dealt with through a schedule rather than through what you call a “‘gateway’ clause”. I think that the same question was asked in a slightly different way by Katy Clark about the extent to which it should apply.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 22 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is fine. It was lovely to have them.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
Part of the work programme that we envisage includes some form of inquiry into CPGs. From the outset of this parliamentary session, MSPs who were returned with considerably more experience than others had a view on the number of CPGs. Members have commented on that, subjectively and objectively, because of the time commitment and because, as far as the committee is concerned, CPGs have responsibilities under the code of conduct, which relate specifically to the MSPs who are involved.
I have said before that, sometimes, MSPs need to be protected from themselves. We have the opportunity to take evidence in whatever form from people who are involved in CPGs and to return to the report that we are considering today. Serious questions need to be asked. The original purpose behind CPGs, which I laid out at the outset, is incredibly important, and that has not changed. However, there is clearly a challenge in complying with the responsibilities that MSPs take on when they—willingly—agree to do the useful task of convening and organising a group.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 February 2024
Martin Whitfield
It is.