Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 17 September 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 1824 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

I want to move on to another provision that the bill proposes, which is in relation to the postponement of elections. All three organisations that are represented today have made submissions on that. Andy Hunter, I will come to you first, because I was interested in the point in your submission that, in essence, elections could be postponed by up to 16 weeks. I do not expect you to comment on the policy decision in that regard but, with regard to the practicalities of a single or double suspension, what is the effect at the chalkface, to use an old teaching phrase, when the phone rings and you are told that an election has been postponed?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

If we put aside the cause of the postponement, would a fixed, albeit longer, period rather than two shorter periods be helpful? Would it be helpful to know even before a postponement happens that it would be for a set period? Would that make the administration easier?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

Things would reset anyway.

Before I open up the topic to other witnesses, I want to ask about the recruitment of staff, which you highlighted as being one of the challenges. Do you want to explain why that is a challenge, given that there is not a significant number of people who only ever do election work and sit around in their holiday homes for the bits in between?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

Do you have a short question, Stephen, or has it been answered?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

That is very helpful.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

Robert Nicol and Andy Hunter, do you want to add anything on that just now?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

Our second agenda item is evidence on the Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill. We are joined by Malcolm Burr, convener of the Electoral Management Board for Scotland; Andy Hunter, chair of the Scotland and Northern Ireland branch of the Association of Electoral Administrators; and Robert Nicol, vice-chair of the Scottish Assessors Association’s electoral registration committee and electoral registration officer for East Renfrewshire, Inverclyde and Renfrewshire.

Those are very long titles, but you are all very welcome at committee to give your contributions on the bill. If you are content, I will push off with questions, with the usual convener’s proviso that not everybody has to answer all the questions, but you should feel free to do so if you want to contribute something.

I kick off with the proposal in the bill to extend candidacy rights, particularly to those with limited leave to remain. I ask Malcolm Burr to answer first. What are your thoughts on the advantages and disadvantages of that proposal, and do you have any concerns about it?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Elections (Representation and Reform) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 21 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

The disqualification order would be on the public record. In an election, would it be a challenge if there was more onus on the people who check the details to ensure that the voluntary information is correct? It is slightly different from some of the other matters that are, rightly, taken at face value. A disqualification order would be in effect within the public realm, so would it be unreasonable to expect something further than just the candidate having the obligation to declare it?

Citizen Participation and Public Petitions Committee

Continued Petitions

Meeting date: 20 March 2024

Martin Whitfield

I thank the committee and the convener for allowing me to make this statement. It will be very short.

With the greatest respect, I suggest that a lot of the discussion is mixing two elements. One is whether the survivors who lodged the petition can enter the redress scheme. The second is whether, if they do enter the redress scheme, they can produce the evidence that is required. I think it would be helpful to separate those things.

I understand, from the Deputy First Minister’s answer to Foysol Choudhury, that it sits within her power to change the regulations and allow entry to the redress scheme. As, I think, Oliver Mundell pointed out, once the petitioners were in the redress scheme, it would be for the evidence to be balanced.

The First Minister gave the figure of 79 per cent for all those across Scotland who were in agreement with the remit of the redress scheme. Does the Deputy First Minister think that, if the people of Scotland understood this petition in the way that this committee does and in the way that the people who have attended today do, those 79 per cent would say they do not deserve redress?

10:30  

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Decision on Taking Business in Private

Meeting date: 29 February 2024

Martin Whitfield

Good morning, and welcome to the fifth meeting in 2024 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee. This is only the second time that the committee—or its predecessors—has sat on a leap day. I have received no apologies.

Agenda item 1 is a decision on whether to take in private item 3, which is consideration of the evidence that we are about to hear from our witnesses. Is the committee content to take item 3 in private?

Members indicated agreement.