The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1824 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Is there a resource implication, or is it a principle that returning officers should accept what is presented to them by an individual or the supporting team around them?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Would it be helpful or otherwise if postponement, rather than just being a pause for a period, reset the clock? Let us say we were four weeks into what is colloquially called the short campaign and there was a postponement for a period. When the clock restarted, would it make any difference from a practical point of view if you had to deliver within the remaining two weeks or restart the full six-week short campaign?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
I will explore that a little bit. If you are not in a position to advise at the moment, I am more than happy for you to come back to us in writing. Do you think that time should, in essence, freeze during a postponement, with no additional people being allowed to come on to the register, or would it be better to accept that the passage of time during a postponement means that people are entitled to come on to and, indeed, come off the register? From an administrative, non-policy position, which would be the best approach?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
My last question relates to the postponement of elections. I know that a lot derives from policy, but your input would be helpful. If a postponement is being considered, there should be consultation. Are there any organisations that you would like to see on that consultation list before the decision is made?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
Malcolm, do you want to add anything?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
I understand that there is a policy dimension to this question, but I want to talk about the practicalities. Would automatic voter registration cause you any administration problems? I know that it would be a different landscape. Quite apart from than the policy decision about whether there should or should not be automatic voter registration, does anything about it concern you?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
That is fine. I am interested in it from the administrative point of view, so that we could have that on the record.
My other question is on an aspect that seems to be omitted from the bill, which is the emergency proxy vote, particularly for carers. I will come to you first, Andy Hunter, on the practical matters, and then to you, Malcolm Burr. What are your views on that situation? From my experience of running around on election day, that is the one question that keeps coming up, but no one seems to know the answer to it.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
From an administrative point of view, is the existing system fine? Could it take other applicants’ names being added to it without too much challenge?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 21 March 2024
Martin Whitfield
No—not unless you have anything that follows from that answer.