The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2357 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Peter Stanyon, are there alternatives that we should have on the horizon rather than the recall that is proposed?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
In the North Antrim example, one thing that was pointed out was the relatively small number of locations in which the petition could be signed in some areas in comparison with others. Is it important that the bill contains clarification and certainty on that point, potentially giving a minimum and maximum number of places in which to sign the petition? I accept that those are not polling stations, but would that be an important step in giving a level of credence to the petition system? It would also avoid having people who object pointing out that something like the North Antrim scenario has occurred.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
For clarification, you are all content that, once it has been identified that 10 per cent has been reached, the petition should just be closed. I am dreading the next question, because I know what it will open up.
Should where you sign the petition be geographically limited? If we were to think in regional area terms, why could I not travel to Dumfries and sign the petition there, other than because of the fact that the office there would have no record of my registration?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Yes. It might be a policy decision—I am happy for you to say so if it is—but would that be reasonable? Would it be practical? In order for the administration to be straightforward, should the signing of the petition be restricted to the geographical area where you are registered?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
It is more a high-level electoral voting facilitation question, rather than one in respect of the bill that is before us.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, the answer in relation to the bill is that there is a geographical restriction because that is the register that people are on for the petition. That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
As you discussed, is there a danger in relation to the availability of places in which to sign, from an accessibility and support point of view? We protect our polling stations for good reason, because we know where they are and what they are. With the signing petition, an address could suddenly become unavailable and 11,000 people could turn up on Monday morning at 9 am, because that is when the place opens. Is that an issue from an administrative or practical perspective?
I am happy for you to consider that and come back with an answer. Is there a balance in relation to doing what Graham Simpson proposes and absolutely restricting the areas where petitions can be signed by telling people that that is the only place that they can sign it?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is fine.
I ask the question because of comments that I have noted both in your submission and in others about the use of postal votes. The simple challenge is that someone might return their postal vote when the petition has already been closed; however, we know what the postal vote will say, because of the question that has been asked. Is there an issue that we should be considering with regard to postal votes and closing the petition early, or could we say that the petition should stay open for the four weeks, because, at the end of it, people would know the proportion of the electorate who voted for the recall, compared with the whole? Is there value in having that information?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
In that case, would it better if some of the requirements sat in secondary legislation rather than primary legislation, so that, as more information became available and as we understood things better, it could be amended more easily?