The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
It is for that exact reason that the committee is asking itself how, subject to the Parliament’s decision on the bill before us, we might future proof that situation in which a First Minister might use the veto. In that case, the only remedy for an individual would be, as Ross Grimley has said, to take the First Minister to court and have a judicial review of the process of using that veto, which might have been used because of, say, national security or any of the other exemptions.
This is one of the few areas of the bill where the responses that we have received have been overwhelmingly articulated in the same way, which is as follows: “This veto has existed from day 1, it has never been used, and we don’t think it is necessary.” The Scottish Government is making a statement to the people of Scotland that there is some information that, rightly and for extremely good reasons, cannot be disclosed, but the power is never going to sit just with the First Minister—there are layers before that.
I just wonder whether this brings us back to what we have been talking about with regard to the pause and people failing to get the information that they think they are entitled to or that they think exists. Is the Scottish Government actually the outlier? I understand the reasons behind the argument, but can I suggest that you think again—or at least consider the issue again?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Absolutely. I am sorry, Ruth—you wanted to come in.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
And there is a value in freedom of information.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Good morning. I welcome everyone to the 22nd meeting in 2025 of the Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee.
I have received apologies from Emma Roddick. I welcome Rona Mackay, who attends as committee substitute. Good morning, Rona.
Our first item is an evidence-taking session on the Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill at stage 1. We are joined by Katy Clark MSP, who introduced the bill.
I welcome our witnesses. David Hamilton is the Scottish Information Commissioner, and Paul Mutch is deputy head of policy and information in the commissioner’s office. Good morning.
I will kick straight off with questions. I will come to you first, David, as commissioner.
In the spirit of a starter for 10, will you expand on why you think that reform of primary legislation is needed at this stage? That is a nice, easy opening question.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is fine.
I am going to jump about a bit and come to Jill McPherson regarding the listed public authorities. Is the review still on-going or has it concluded?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you, minister, and thank you, Jill McPherson and Ross Grimley, for your evidence and for attending the committee this morning. I know that you are going to write to us. We know where you are, and you know where we are.
11:01 Meeting continued in private until 11:24.Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Yes.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I go back to the concept in the bill of a movement to proactive publication. You have set out your response to that and the concerns about it. Would the Government support it if a limitation to the specific information that needs to be proactively published was specified through secondary legislation or guidance, or, to look at it the other way, if there were very clear exemptions to proactive publication? Could a process shift the view of the Government on its stance on institutions moving to proactive publication?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful. Interestingly, in its submission, the Law Society of Scotland talked about your lack of power with regard to the inspection of electronic devices and things like that. You have already talked about certain areas in which things need to be tightened up because they were missed or because they just need to be tightened up. Have you considered what other powers you need and whether the bill might be the vehicle to provide you with those powers? Such powers could include the seizure of electronic devices or access to AI databases in California to see what is in them.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 20 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Do you see the designation of freedom of information officers within institutions as an advantage? Do you see the benefit of having such officers as a place for you or the public to go to in the first instance?