The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2354 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
That is probably the finest defence that I have heard in a long time of a little human intervention at the right moment, before you press send on your computer. Interestingly, we will have another commissioner in front of us next week, and we will discuss a not dissimilar issue. People recognise that a really important discussion needs to happen on AI, and I think that we need to start having discussions about ethical use and so on sooner rather than later.
I thank you and your staff, who support you, for the annual report and for the evidence that you have given. If anything comes to mind afterwards, you know where to find us—at least for the next few weeks—or those who will follow us in the future. Given that this is probably the last time that I will have a chance to speak to you in this parliamentary session, I thank your office and you personally for your work as Scottish Information Commissioner. Thank you for the openness with which you have confronted the challenges that we have placed on you and for giving us the answers that we need.
We will now move into private session to consider the evidence that we have heard.
10:12
Meeting continued in private until 10:28.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
In essence, you end up having an annual—sometimes more frequent—argument about needing more resource. Is that because the model that is used to calculate the resource is wrong and we should look at it again, or is there a way that we could anticipate increasing needs? As you say, those are hard to identify, but you have mentioned a number of factors in relation to which resource is becoming a challenge. From your point of view, do we need to look at the resourcing model?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
I will park the question of the extent to which AI can amend FOI for a possible future conference, and I will bring in Sue Webber.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for that. As is the convener’s prerogative, I will kick off our questions.
You have touched on the fact that the report is a historical document, and you have given us some reflections on what this year has been like. Do you see light at the end of the tunnel, or are you concerned about the partial success of raising freedom of information requests and the availability of its counterpart under the environmental information regulations?
I suspect that there is a change in culture of people wanting to know and fighting for it. Do you see light at the end of the tunnel, or is that light blocked at the moment?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
So, hopefully, that will not appear in next year’s report.
I invite Annie Wells to come in. We are having some technical difficulties, so I am not sure whether you can hear us, Annie.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
I have always had an interest in your work with regard to children and young people and underrepresented groups. We have spoken in the past about the challenge of getting those groups to understand their rights. Will you give us an update on where you are on that now and how you see that developing, rather than the retrospect that we have in the report?
09:15
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
From the report, at a very simplistic level, it seems that your expenditure has gone up, the reserves are, in effect, gone and savings are immediately absorbed because you have an increased workload. Would it be fair to say that? It is worth a conversation—or maybe something slightly stronger than that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Like many staff, your investigators and staff are sometimes at the front edge of that.
Before I close this part of the meeting, is there anything else that you would like to add?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
No problem, Annie—technology is what it is.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 26 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Commissioner, you have talked about the budgetary challenge—your resource challenge. You have a request in at the moment and were gleeful at the passing of the budget last night, although the funds have probably come from somewhere else. Is the resourcing model working and will it work going forward, or should the Parliament and the Scottish Government look at the model for the commissioner?