The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2081 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, the answer in relation to the bill is that there is a geographical restriction because that is the register that people are on for the petition. That is helpful.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
As you discussed, is there a danger in relation to the availability of places in which to sign, from an accessibility and support point of view? We protect our polling stations for good reason, because we know where they are and what they are. With the signing petition, an address could suddenly become unavailable and 11,000 people could turn up on Monday morning at 9 am, because that is when the place opens. Is that an issue from an administrative or practical perspective?
I am happy for you to consider that and come back with an answer. Is there a balance in relation to doing what Graham Simpson proposes and absolutely restricting the areas where petitions can be signed by telling people that that is the only place that they can sign it?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is fine.
I ask the question because of comments that I have noted both in your submission and in others about the use of postal votes. The simple challenge is that someone might return their postal vote when the petition has already been closed; however, we know what the postal vote will say, because of the question that has been asked. Is there an issue that we should be considering with regard to postal votes and closing the petition early, or could we say that the petition should stay open for the four weeks, because, at the end of it, people would know the proportion of the electorate who voted for the recall, compared with the whole? Is there value in having that information?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
In that case, would it better if some of the requirements sat in secondary legislation rather than primary legislation, so that, as more information became available and as we understood things better, it could be amended more easily?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Is there a challenge in introducing the petition and in the subsequent regional poll such that the number of electoral methods that are being used in Scotland gets to a point at which fewer people than are sitting in this room understand them all? You have set out the need for strong communication based on a system that is as simple to understand as possible. From an administrative point of view—I recognise the evidence that you have given about the cost, but let us put that to one side—is it a step too far to bring yet another electoral system into Scotland?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
I appreciate that.
Let me just push at this issue. The four-week period makes sense, and I think that the reality is that, in all but one of the examples of the UK-wide petition examples that we can look at, the threshold was reached very early on. Should a petition close at that stage? Is there any value in its running on?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
The votes of the 60 per cent of people who go the other way.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
My follow-up question is on the fact that we have heard the petition described as an electoral event rather than an election. Should we give strong credence to the risk that, if you turn up at a venue, others will be able to identify the view that you will express?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
For clarification, with regard to the petition, the information is the simple number of people who have signed that day. Yes, there will be a collation of the hard data, for other purposes, but the feedback is not the same as for an election, in which a count has to take place. For a petition, it is simply one person to count and a second person to certify the number on the list. That is helpful to know.
I will turn to Emma Roddick to lead on the next area, which the committee has had an interesting discussion about.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 8 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Therefore, we should have confidence in human rights legislation, under which this is a balancing act. It is about the minimum amount of information that needs to be held, accessed and viewed for us to come to a conclusion.
You might say that this is a policy decision, but should we have a test, and should that be on the balance of probability or should it be beyond reasonable doubt? Whoever makes the decision, at what level do you think the balance should be set?