The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Might you consider looking at that in the post-review analysis?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
My challenge to you, then, is that, in your explanation for decisions, when people raise questions about why you did something, you tend to point at one of those specific rules rather than saying, “Actually, it’s an amalgam of rules, and this is the consensus that we have come to.”
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
There is something in that, potentially—if, instead of
“boundaries of local government areas”,
it had said “ward boundaries”.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
I was not talking about the construction of the constituencies in the regions. I meant some of the explanations that have been given to constituents of why their proposal has not been taken up. The correspondence shows you pointing at one of the four rules, rather than the explanation that you have just given.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Is it much easier to attach automaticity of boundary changes to such a rule than to what we have in Scotland—and to justify changes?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Let us take what has happened in South Scotland as a regional example—which is a slight reflection of what has happened in the past—of satisfying the numbers and a geographical identity, which is the Lothians. If we go along the boundary of South Scotland, another area had to go down into the South Scotland region. That is all in the give and take of the process.
What was it that led you to conclude that your proposals were the right moves, given that it was a removal of an area compared with what has been the understanding for a long period of time? What was it that triggered that being the solution, rather than sticking to the status quo?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
So the map is driven by the written description. The map is illustrative of the consequences of the description on the ground.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Perfect.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
It would go further than that, in the sense that there would be parity up to the trigger of the event that would lead to a recall petition. Parity commences when a member takes the oath. There would be parity up to the point at which a member is shown—if proved through the process and after appeals—to be unfit to hold the office. Is the Scottish Government comfortable with the idea that that is the edge of parity and that the recall process could reflect the different ways in which people come here before taking the oath?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 12 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Does the Scottish Government not having a view also extend—we are getting to the unknown unknowns—to views or opinions in our stage 1 report if we suggest changes? Is the Government in any way concerned that there might be different journeys for different MSPs after a recall has been triggered?