The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
The challenge is in the way that the bill is drafted. There are objective tests to be met, such as being sentenced to imprisonment, and there is no excuse for that. There are then the more subjective behavioural choices. I do not want to use the word “excuses”, because they are not excuses, but there might be explanations for those choices. I am just trying to work out which is the most important from your point of view.
An objective, simply assessed test is that you are in prison. A more subjective test is absence, and if you can give a reason, such as general data protection regulations, privacy, family support and all that, then that is all right. However, the voter from that area is going to say, “They said that that was all right, but they did not say why.”
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
In essence, that is the application of the balance that I was inquiring about between the objective and the subjective.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
This is the final oral session, so, if you have thoughts after the session on what has been asked, please reach out to the committee. Do you want to say anything, Graham?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
There is no suggestion whatsoever that Jamie Greene would be recalled.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is probably exactly where we are going with the questions.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
What does “physical attendance” mean in the bill?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Are members content to delegate authority to me to sign off the terms of the report?
Members indicated agreement.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, it is about the act of incarceration?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
But in a suspended sentence, there would not be an incarceration, therefore it would not trigger—
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Absolutely. I have a couple of questions with regard to the custodial sentence aspect. At the minute, as you rightly set out, the rules specify a sentence of more than 12 months and the bill looks at reducing that to six months. I go back to the word “objective”, which is the word that I have probably used the most today. Is the objective test the fact that the custodial sentence is six months, or is it about the type of case that has occasioned that six-month sentence?