Skip to main content
Loading…

Seòmar agus comataidhean

Official Report: search what was said in Parliament

The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.  

Criathragan Hide all filters

Dates of parliamentary sessions
  1. Session 1: 12 May 1999 to 31 March 2003
  2. Session 2: 7 May 2003 to 2 April 2007
  3. Session 3: 9 May 2007 to 22 March 2011
  4. Session 4: 11 May 2011 to 23 March 2016
  5. Session 5: 12 May 2016 to 4 May 2021
  6. Current session: 13 May 2021 to 6 December 2025
Select which types of business to include


Select level of detail in results

Displaying 2076 contributions

|

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

It is the act of losing one’s liberty that occasions the provision.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Emma Roddick has a question.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

To where?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

It is, but I am exploring what “physical attendance” means. Does it mean being in the chamber with your card in the machine or at a formal, open committee meeting, even though you might not be a committee member?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

In the chamber during a plenary session.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Thank you very much for your opening comments, particularly those about a committee member whom we hope to see return in the very near future. Now is the moment for all those people whom you have grilled to open the popcorn and pull their chair forward.

I will kick us off. You answered my first question, on what you would say is the main purpose of recall. I would like to explore that with you a bit. In much of the documentation and, indeed, the representations that you have made today, you have talked specifically about the MSP as an individual and about their behaviour or choices falling below what their electorate could reasonably expect of them. In the bill, you lay out some simple, objective tests to determine whether an MSP has fallen short. There are, however, also subjective tests, such as providing a reasonable explanation for why something has happened. Do you find that a challenge? We would potentially put into legislation something that others—possibly this committee or its future iterations, as your bill suggests—would decide. Are there challenges in relation to giving subjective tests to future committees when the bill also contains simple objective tests in relation to sentencing and things like that? What is your thinking about those two decisions?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Sorry—I do not mean to cut across you. I think that we will address the specifics of that part of the bill in other questions. I am trying to ask the higher-level question about whether you are content that your bill contains both objective, easily understood reasons for a recall but also subjective assessments on which someone else must make a decision before the recall. Is there a contradiction in that? Are you happy with that? Are you happy that those decisions would go to a future decision-making body?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

You have foreseen where my questions are going. Effectively, under the procedures that we have at the moment, if you attend an open meeting of a committee that you are a member of or attend a committee to speak to a member’s bill, as you have done, your attendance is noted in the Official Report. Similarly, for a plenary session in the chamber, you presumably have to put your card into the slot and wait for the little lights to light up. You are not required to contribute or vote, and you are not required to actively follow a process in order to get yourself on the record as having attended.

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

Given the specificity that I have given on the chamber and committee, should the primary legislation define attendance, or would you prefer to see the definition in secondary legislation, because it might change?

Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee

Scottish Parliament (Recall and Removal of Members) Bill: Stage 1

Meeting date: 19 June 2025

Martin Whitfield

I cannot imagine that.