The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2076 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
It is the act of losing one’s liberty that occasions the provision.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Emma Roddick has a question.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
To where?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
It is, but I am exploring what “physical attendance” means. Does it mean being in the chamber with your card in the machine or at a formal, open committee meeting, even though you might not be a committee member?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
In the chamber during a plenary session.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Thank you very much for your opening comments, particularly those about a committee member whom we hope to see return in the very near future. Now is the moment for all those people whom you have grilled to open the popcorn and pull their chair forward.
I will kick us off. You answered my first question, on what you would say is the main purpose of recall. I would like to explore that with you a bit. In much of the documentation and, indeed, the representations that you have made today, you have talked specifically about the MSP as an individual and about their behaviour or choices falling below what their electorate could reasonably expect of them. In the bill, you lay out some simple, objective tests to determine whether an MSP has fallen short. There are, however, also subjective tests, such as providing a reasonable explanation for why something has happened. Do you find that a challenge? We would potentially put into legislation something that others—possibly this committee or its future iterations, as your bill suggests—would decide. Are there challenges in relation to giving subjective tests to future committees when the bill also contains simple objective tests in relation to sentencing and things like that? What is your thinking about those two decisions?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Sorry—I do not mean to cut across you. I think that we will address the specifics of that part of the bill in other questions. I am trying to ask the higher-level question about whether you are content that your bill contains both objective, easily understood reasons for a recall but also subjective assessments on which someone else must make a decision before the recall. Is there a contradiction in that? Are you happy with that? Are you happy that those decisions would go to a future decision-making body?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
You have foreseen where my questions are going. Effectively, under the procedures that we have at the moment, if you attend an open meeting of a committee that you are a member of or attend a committee to speak to a member’s bill, as you have done, your attendance is noted in the Official Report. Similarly, for a plenary session in the chamber, you presumably have to put your card into the slot and wait for the little lights to light up. You are not required to contribute or vote, and you are not required to actively follow a process in order to get yourself on the record as having attended.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
Given the specificity that I have given on the chamber and committee, should the primary legislation define attendance, or would you prefer to see the definition in secondary legislation, because it might change?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee
Meeting date: 19 June 2025
Martin Whitfield
I cannot imagine that.