The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2286 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Thank you for that.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Could they use the Young Scot card/bus pass?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 12 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
That is a disappointment. It is a challenge. The incredible and vast majority of 14 and 15-year-olds are obviously in the education system such that, ironically, with a different hat on, most of the returning officers would have access to the data and confirmation of all that is needed. However, we will leave that there.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
I welcome that intervention. I absolutely agree—it would certainly not be for this section of the bill, but there are other sections in which the matter can be dealt with.
With that assurance, convener, I seek to withdraw amendment 167.
Amendment 167, by agreement, withdrawn.
09:45
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
I thank the minister for her comments. This is certainly a case of great minds thinking alike, as we are both seeking to extend the section in a similar way. However, as my colleague Jeremy Balfour says, the minister’s comment that she prefers her own amendment reads like most of my school reports—“Could do better.”
In the circumstances, I am content to listen and will support the minister’s amendment. I welcome the Government’s support for amendment 171. I had much harsher words than “innovative” for such providers coming in in the future, but I like the word “innovative”, so we will stick with that for the public record. I have nothing further to add.
Amendment 17 agreed to.
Amendment 170 not moved.
Amendment 171 moved—[Martin Whitfield]—and agreed to.
Amendment 18 moved—[Natalie Don-Innes]—and agreed to.
Section 8, as amended, agreed to
Section 9 agreed to.
After section 9
Amendment 19 moved—[Natalie Don-Innes]—and agreed to.
Section 10—Register of foster carers
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
I have nothing really to add, except to say that I will press amendment 172.
Amendment 172 agreed to.
Amendment 173 moved—[Martin Whitfield]—and agreed to.
Amendments 174 to 176 not moved.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Moved.
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
I absolutely welcome the proposal that the minister makes. In essence, if we all leave the amendments in the group in abeyance ahead of that discussion before stage 3, we will not pre-define anything. We have not heard any new evidence, but there has been some discussion about a different aspect of the role of the single-member panel. Does the minister agree that not moving the amendments in the group would indicate everyone’s intention to work in good faith to reach agreement on the matter?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
Will the minister take an intervention?
Education, Children and Young People Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 11 February 2026
Martin Whitfield
In essence, the amendment shifts the onus to a presumption of attendance; it does not impose a mandatory requirement for attendance where the questions have been asked. Rather than what the minister said earlier, the amendment is about reaching the right decision with regard to the young person. That starts with a presumption of attendance, which can then be rebutted.