The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 2081 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Agenda item 2 is an evidence-taking session on the Freedom of Information Reform (Scotland) Bill. I welcome Katy Clark, the member in charge of the bill. She is supported today by Carole Ewart, the director of the Campaign for Freedom of Information in Scotland. Thank you both for joining us. I will hand over to you, Katy, to make some opening remarks.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Your view is that an email address should be sufficient and it does not need to be an email address and postal address—is that right?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That, in essence, would also be your thesis in response to the point that new designations would cost money. When there is a new designation, much of the work of the Information Commissioner will already have been done, unless the individual, authority or entity wants to spend a fortune. Designation will be presented as a step, and a newly designated body should not fear it, because, if it is a well-run organisation, it can comply easily.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
I apologise for interrupting you, Carole. I am conscious of the time, because we have a lot to get through. The session is for the member. A substantial amount of what you have talked about has been submitted in evidence, so we have heard it. I am conscious that we want to hear from the member in charge of the bill rather than consider evidence that we have already heard, because, if the bill progresses, we must also establish the amount of room that we have to make changes. However, thank you for that contribution.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Sorry, Ruth. I did not mean to cut across you.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
Obviously, standing orders cannot direct legislation. However, the motion that would be debated in the Parliament could articulate the date when the designation would take effect. Is that the vehicle by which you see the designation occurring, rather than it being made by the minister and subsequently reviewed in the debate? Do you see Parliament having that role in debating the motion as the vehicle of designation?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is helpful.
Let us turn to the financial memorandum and the duty to publish. As you have articulated, including just now, the duty to publish is a reframing of an existing obligation—it is where we want to get to. Therefore, you have suggested that the duty is, in effect, cost neutral, because we are just moving on. The Government does not agree with you. What is your evidence for your position? What is your view? Does proactive publication simply reframe an existing duty, which therefore already encompasses it? Alternatively, given the evidence that we have heard about the changes that might be required, particularly in councils, do you think that the Government might have a point in saying that the provision could require resource?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
In your introduction, you made the point that this is actually a technical bill rather than a bill that covers massively new ground. You have said that the financial memorandum is accurate in that you are reframing an existing obligation. However, you also talked about the bill trying to achieve cultural change, and we all know that cultural change is incredibly difficult to achieve and invariably comes with costs. What is your view on that specific issue?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
One of the other criticisms that have been levelled at the provision is that, although it would hardly ever be used, local authorities would now potentially have to store information for ever and a day, because they would be concerned that, at some point in the future, someone would come along and say, “This person deliberately got rid of it.” How would you answer that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 27 November 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is fine. Thank you.
I thank Carole Ewart and Katy Clark for attending this morning. If thoughts or views come to mind, as sometimes happens the second you step outside of the door, you know where the clerks are in order to reach us, and vice versa, should we have any questions further to our deliberations, I hope that you do not mind our reaching out to you for answers.
10:06 Meeting continued in private until 10:41.