The Official Report is a written record of public meetings of the Parliament and committees.
The Official Report search offers lots of different ways to find the information you’re looking for. The search is used as a professional tool by researchers and third-party organisations. It is also used by members of the public who may have less parliamentary awareness. This means it needs to provide the ability to run complex searches, and the ability to browse reports or perform a simple keyword search.
The web version of the Official Report has three different views:
Depending on the kind of search you want to do, one of these views will be the best option. The default view is to show the report for each meeting of Parliament or a committee. For a simple keyword search, the results will be shown by item of business.
When you choose to search by a particular MSP, the results returned will show each spoken contribution in Parliament or a committee, ordered by date with the most recent contributions first. This will usually return a lot of results, but you can refine your search by keyword, date and/or by meeting (committee or Chamber business).
We’ve chosen to display the entirety of each MSP’s contribution in the search results. This is intended to reduce the number of times that users need to click into an actual report to get the information that they’re looking for, but in some cases it can lead to very short contributions (“Yes.”) or very long ones (Ministerial statements, for example.) We’ll keep this under review and get feedback from users on whether this approach best meets their needs.
There are two types of keyword search:
If you select an MSP’s name from the dropdown menu, and add a phrase in quotation marks to the keyword field, then the search will return only examples of when the MSP said those exact words. You can further refine this search by adding a date range or selecting a particular committee or Meeting of the Parliament.
It’s also possible to run basic Boolean searches. For example:
There are two ways of searching by date.
You can either use the Start date and End date options to run a search across a particular date range. For example, you may know that a particular subject was discussed at some point in the last few weeks and choose a date range to reflect that.
Alternatively, you can use one of the pre-defined date ranges under “Select a time period”. These are:
If you search by an individual session, the list of MSPs and committees will automatically update to show only the MSPs and committees which were current during that session. For example, if you select Session 1 you will be show a list of MSPs and committees from Session 1.
If you add a custom date range which crosses more than one session of Parliament, the lists of MSPs and committees will update to show the information that was current at that time.
All Official Reports of meetings in the Debating Chamber of the Scottish Parliament.
All Official Reports of public meetings of committees.
Displaying 1653 contributions
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Following on from that, I would say that another aspect of this is the money that is spent. With some of the petitions that make it to Westminster, parties have put enormous resource into ensuring that the 10 per cent threshold is reached. Do we need to take that issue into account? Obviously, that might not be dealt with in primary legislation, but there is a question about how much money is thrown at recalls. In some of the examples that you have shared from the US, those who backed petitions with a high level of resource achieved changes that might not otherwise have occurred. What level of credit, credence and thought should we give to that issue at this stage?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
So, make it a separation at that point.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Is that a comment about your bill or about this committee? In any case, I am more than happy to take the flavour of the witnesses’ views.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Are there any other comments?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
That is very helpful. As always, it is the detail that causes the problem.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Do you have any concerns, or see any potential problems, with the conflict between the methodology in the bill, which is effectively direct, and the representative element? Should we be concerned enough to say that we should never let the two mix, or are you confident that there is scope for both in proportion?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
It is not a dynamic that we are used to in our democracy.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
Following on from that, I would suggest that absence is an example of a potentially political, internal or behavioural choice by an MSP. I do not sense strong disagreement to that view, but there is a range of views from the witnesses as to whether it should be included in the bill as a trigger for a recall process. Someone is bound to suggest that to me, so I will seek your views independently of this place.
It goes back, in part, to Emma Roddick’s point about proportionality. Should the bill consider what happens if an MSP chooses to change or leave their political party—or, to give an entire view of the matter, if they are expelled—or, again, should the internal mechanics of this place deal with that?
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
If it is short.
Standards, Procedures and Public Appointments Committee [Draft]
Meeting date: 22 May 2025
Martin Whitfield
I welcome everyone to our second evidence session. Annabel Mullin, director of communications, Elect Her, joins us online. In the room, we have Juliet Swann, nations and regions programme manager, Transparency International UK, and Willie Sullivan, director, Electoral Reform Society in Scotland. Good morning and welcome to you all. If you wish to answer a question—as I always say, there is no necessity to do so—type R in the chat if you are online, or indicate to me if you are in the room, and I will bring you in. We continue to be joined by Graham Simpson, who is the member in charge of the bill.
We will kick straight off with questions. I will start with an overarching question: do you support a recall mechanism for MSPs?